Preference for diazepam in anxious adults

Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1990, Pages 190-196

  McCracken, Stanley G ^a,b   De Wit, Harriet ^b   Uhlenhuth, Eberhard H ^c   Johanson, Chris E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAZEPAM;

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG PREFERENCE; DRUG THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDERS; AROUSAL; ATTITUDE; DIAZEPAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PERSONALITY TESTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0025297135     PISSN: 02710749     EISSN: 1533712X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004714-199006000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Swinson RP, Pecknold JC, Kirby ME. Benzodiazepine dependence. J Affect Dis 1987;13:109-18.
2. Allgulander C. History and current status of sedative-hypnotic drug use and abuse. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986;73:465-78.
3. Dietch J. The nature and extent of benzodiazepine abuse: an overview of recent literature. Hosp Comm Psychiatry 1983;34:1139-45.
4. Woods JH, Katz JL, Winger G. Abuse liability of benzodiazepines. Pharm Rev 1987;39:251-413.
5. Clinthorne JK, Cisin IH, Balter MB, Mellinger GD, Uhlenhuth EH. Changes in popular attitudes and beliefs about tranquilizers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:527-32.
6. de Wit H, Johanson CE. A drug preference procedure for use with human volunteers. In: Bozarth MA, ed. Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987:559-72.
7. Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 1980a;71:275-9.
8. Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH. Drug preferences in humans. Fed Proc 1982;41:228-33.
9. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association,1980.
10. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974;19:1-15.
11. de Wit H, Uhlenhuth EH, Hedeker D, McCracken SG, Johanson CE. Lack of preference for diazepam in anxious volunteers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986a;43:533-41.
12. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Profile of mood states (manual). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971.
13. Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1971;12:245-58.
14. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
15. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
16. Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Frame JW, Hill MA, Jennrich RI, Toporek JD. BMDP statistical software manual. Berkeley: Universitv of California Press. 1983.
17. Norusis MJ. SPSS’ advanced statistics guide. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1985.
18. de Wit H, Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH, McCracken S. The effects of two non-pharmacological variables on drug preference in humans. In: Harris LS, ed. Problems of drug dependence, 1982 (Res Monographs 43). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1983:251-7.
19. Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH. Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam. Psychopharmacology 1980b;71:269-73.
20. de Wit H, Uhlenhuth EH, Johanson CE. Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day. Psychopharmacology 1985;87:186-93.
21. de Wit H, Uhlenhuth EH, Johanson CE. Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam. Drug Alcohol Depend 1986b;16:341-60.
22. de Wit H, Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH. Reinforcing properties of lorazepam in normal volunteer subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend 1984;13:31-41.