|
Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 159-169
|
Is the Copper T 380A device associated with an increased risk of removal due to bleeding and/or Pain? --An Analysis--
a a a b c c d e
e
Clinica Del Paso
*
(Mexico)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;
LIPPES LOOP D;
MULTILOAD COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;
MULTILOAD CU 200;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN CELL;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE;
METHODOLOGY;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PAIN;
PREGNANCY RATE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SIDE EFFECT;
UTERUS BLEEDING;
BLEEDING;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
COMPARATIVE STUDIES;
CONTRACEPTION;
CONTRACEPTION TERMINATION--INDICATIONS;
CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DATA COLLECTION;
DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS;
DISEASES;
EVALUATION;
FAMILY PLANNING;
FERTILITY;
INCIDENCE;
IUD;
IUD, COPPER RELEASING;
MEASUREMENT;
PAIN;
POPULATION;
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS;
POPULATION DYNAMICS;
PREGNANCY, UNWANTED;
REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY;
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS;
STUDIES;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER;
LIFE TABLES;
SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.;
|
EID: 0025292936
PISSN: 00107824
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90099-H Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (17)
|