Democracy and economic crisis: The Latin American Experience

World Politics

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 1990, Pages 315-335

  Remmer, Karen L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITARIANISM; DEBT CRISIS; DEMOCRACY; ECONOMIC CRISIS;

LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 0025232116     PISSN: 00438871     EISSN: 10863338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2010414     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Jimmy Carter and Howard Baker, “Latin America's Debt and U.S. Interests,” in Robert A. Pastor, ed., Latin America's Debt Crisis: Adjusting to the Past or Planning for the Future? (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1987)
2. Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, Latin American Debt (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), 146
3. Mitchell A. Seligson and Edward N. Muller, “Democratic Stability and Economic Crisis: Costa Rica, 1978–1983,” International Studies Quarterly 31 (September 1987), 323
4. “Bush Aides Are Likely to Offer a Plan Soon on Third World Debt,” Wall Street Journal, March 9, 1989, p. 1
5. “Third World Debt Won’t Wait,” New York Times, October 1, 1988, p. 4
6. “Latin Debt Crisis Seen as Threat to Continent's New Democracies,” New York Times, January 17, 1989, p. 3.
7. For a summary and review of this literature as it pertains specifically to Latin America, see Karen L. Remmer, “Evaluating the Policy Impact of Military Regimes in Latin America,” Latin American Research Review 13, No. 2 (1978), 39–54.
8. David Cameron, “Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society,” in John H. Goldthorpe, ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)
9. Francis G. Castles, The Social Democratic Image of Society: A Study of the Achievements and Origins of Scandinavian Social Democracy in Comparative Perspective (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978)
10. William Coleman and W. Grant, “The Organizational Cohesion and Political Access of Business: A Study of Comprehensive Associations,” European Journal of Political Research 16 (September 1988), 467–487
11. Catherine M. Conaghan, Restructuring Domination: Industrialists and the State in Ecuador (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988)
12. Merilee S. Grindle, State and Countryside: Development Policy and Agrarian Politics in Latin America (Bal-timore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986)
13. Stephan Haggard and Robert Kaufman, “The Politics of Stabilization and Structural Adjustment,” in Jeffrey D. Sachs, ed., Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, The International Financial System Vol. i:(Chi–cago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 209–254
14. Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr., “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71 (December 1977): 1467–1487
15. Robert R. Kaufman, The Politics of Debt in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1989)
16. Peter Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986)
17. Stephen McBride, “The Comparative Politics of Unemployment: Swedish and British Responses to Economic Crisis,” Comparative Politics 20 (April 1988), 303–323
18. Ronan Raddison, The Fragmented State (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983)
19. Philippe C. Schmitter, “Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo–Corporatism Has Gone,” in Gerhard Lehmbruch and Philippe C. Schmitter, eds., Patterns of Corporatist Policy–Making (London: Sage Publications, 1982).
20. Skidmore, “The Politics of Economic Stabilization in Postwar Latin America,” in James M. Malloy, ed., Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1977), 149–190.
21. Christian Anglade and Carlos Fortin, eds., The State and Capital Accumulation in Latin America, Vol. 1 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1985), 8
22. Alejandro Foxley, Latin American Experiments in Neoconservative Economics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983)
23. Robert Frenkel and Guillermo O’Donnell, “The ‘Stabilization Programs’ of the International Monetary Fund and Their Internal Impacts,” in Richard R. Fagen, ed., Capitalism and the State in US.–Latin American Relations (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1979), 171–216
24. Robert R. Kaufman, “Democratic and Authoritarian Responses to the Debt Issue: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico,” international Organization 39 (Summer 1985), 473–503
25. Riordan Roett, “The Foreign Debt Crisis and the Process of Redemocratization in Latin America,” in William N. Eskridge, Jr., ed., A Dance along the Precipice: The Political and Economic Dimensions of the International Debt Problem (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985), 207–230
26. John Sheahan, “Market–oriented Economic Policies and Political Repression in Latin America,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 28 (January 1980), 267–291
27. Rosemary Thorp and Laurence Whitehead, “Introduction,” in Thorp and Whitehead, eds., Inflation and Stabilisation in Latin America (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979), 11, 18
28. Jorge Dominguez, “Political Change: Central America, South America, and the Caribbean,” in Myron Weiner and Samuel P. Huntington, eds., Understanding Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown, 1987), 83.
29. James M. Malloy, “The Politics of Transition in Latin America,” in James M. Malloy and Mitchell A. Seligson, eds., Authoritarians and Democrats: Regime Transition in Latin America (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 1987), 249.
30. Karen L. Remmer, “The Politics of Economic Stabilization: IMF Standby Programs in Latin America, 1954–1984,” Comparative Politics 18 (October 1986), 1–24.
31. Haggard, “The Politics of Adjustment: Lessons from the IMF's Extended Fund Facility,” in Miles Kahler, ed., The Politics of International Debt (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985), 157–186.
32. Nelson, “The Politics of Stabilization,” in Richard E. feinberg and Valeriana Kallab, eds., Adjustment Crisis in the Third World (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984).
33. Stallings and Kaufman, “Debt and Democracy in the 1980s: The Latin American Experience,” in Stallings and Kaufman, eds., Debt and Democracy in Latin America (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989), 203, 220.
34. Gourevitch, Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986), 240.
35. William C. Smith, “Heterodox Shocks and the Political Economy of Democratic Transition in Argentina and Brazil,” in William L. Canak, ed., Lost Promises: Debt, Austerity, and Development in Latin America (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989), 156.
36. “Brazil's Democracy in the Balance,” COHA's Washington Report on the Hemisphere 9 (December 7, 1988), 4
37. Weiner, “Empirical Democratic Theory,” in Myron Weiner and Ergun Ozbudun, eds., Competitive Elections in Developing Countries (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987), 18.
38. Hirschman, “The Political Economy of Latin American Development: Seven Exercises in Retrospection,” Latin American Research Review 22, No. 3 (1987), 28.
39. John A. Booth, “Elections and Democracy in Central America: A Framework for Evaluation,” paper prepared for the Southwestern Political Science Association meeting, Little Rock, AR, March 30–April 1, 1989
40. Karen L. Remmer, “Exclusionary Democracy,” Studies in Comparative International Development 20 Winter 1986, 64–85
41. Evelyne Huber Stephens, “Capitalist Development and Democracy in South America,” paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1988.
42. World Bank, world Debt Tables, 1984–85 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1985), 158–227.
43. CEPAL, “Balance preliminar de la economia latinoamericana, 1988” [Preliminary balance of the Latin American economy, 1988], Notas sobre la economia y el desarrollo, No. 470 (December 1988)
44. Inter-American Development Bank, Economic and Social Progress in Latin America (Washington, DC: IADB, 1982–1988).
45. Inter-American Development Bank, Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1987 Report (Washington, DC: IADB, 1987), 246.
46. Johanna Sharp, “Regime Type and Economic Policy Formation: The Case of Brazil, 1982–1989, unpub. (Albuquerque, NM: 1989).
47. Guillermo O’Donnell, Modernization and Bureaucratic–Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1973).
48. O’Donnell, “Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic–Authoritar–ian State,” Latin American Research Review 13, No. 1 (1978), 3–38
49. O’Donnell, “Tensions in the Bureaucratic–Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy,” in David Collier, ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 285–318.
50. William Crowther, “Philippine Authoritarianism and the International Economy,” Comparative Politics 18 (April 1986), 339–356
51. Hyug Baeg Im, “The Rise of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South Korea,” World Politics 39 (January 1987), 231–257.
52. Larry Diamond, “Introduction: Roots of Failure, Seeds of Hope,” in Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, eds., Democracy in Developing Countries, Vol. 2: Africa (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1988), 15.
53. Charles E. Lindblom, Politics and Markets: The World's Political–Economic Systems (New York: Basic Books, 1977)
54. Robert Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (New York: Collier Books, 1962)
55. Grant Mc Connell, Private Power and American Democracy (New York: Knopf, 1966), chap. 5.