![]() |
Volumn 97, Issue 10, 1990, Pages 909-916
|
Randomized comparison of routine vs highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound and biophysical scoring to investigate high risk pregnancies
a
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
HIGH RISK PREGNANCY;
HUMAN;
INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
METHODOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
ULTRASOUND;
ADULT;
AMNIOTIC FLUID;
APGAR SCORE;
CESAREAN SECTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
FETAL DEATH;
FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION;
FETAL MOVEMENT;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
HEART RATE, FETAL;
HUMAN;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
LABOR, INDUCED;
PLACENTA;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
RISK FACTORS;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;
UMBILICAL ARTERIES;
UTERUS;
|
EID: 0025186208
PISSN: 14700328
EISSN: 14710528
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02446.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (55)
|
References (17)
|