How a personal document's intended use or purpose affects its classification in an office

ACM SIGIR Forum

Volumn 23, Issue , 1989, Pages 207-210

  Kwasnik, Barbara H ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; DOCUMENT USE; OFFICE PRACTICES;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0024676559     PISSN: 01635840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/75335.75356     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. CASE, D.O. Collection and organization of written information by social scientists and humanists: a review and exploratory study. Journal of Information Science 11(1986).
2. DERVEN, B. Information as a user construct: the relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In: Ward, S.A. & Reed, L.J. (Eds.). Knowledge Structure and Use: Perspectives on Synthesis and Interpretation, Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press, 1983: 153–83.
3. ERICSSON, K.A. & SIMON, H.A. Verbal reports as dato. Psychological Review. 87(3) (May, 1980):215–251.
4. FRAKE, C.O. The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. In: Tyler, S. A. (Ed.). Cognitive Anthropology. New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
5. KWASNIK, B.H. The influence of context on classificatory behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University, 1989.
6. MALONE, T.W. How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1(1) (Jan., 1983):99–112.
7. MISCHLER, E.G. Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review 49(1) (Feb., 1979):1–19.
8. ROSCH, E. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7(4) (1975):532–47.
9. SPRADLEY, IP. The Ethnographic Interview. New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.
10. TYLER, S.A. (ED.) Introduction. In: Cognitive Anthropology. New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.