Autocorrelation and Regularization in Digital Images II. Simple Image Models

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1989, Pages 247-258

  Jupp, David L B ^a   Strahler, Alan H ^b   Woodcock, Curtis E ^c  

^a CSIRO LAND AND WATER   (Australia)

^b Department of Geography and Center for Remote Sensing Boston University ^*

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

auto covariance; digital image; regionalized variable; Remote sensing; spatial statistics; variogram

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING--IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS;

AUTOCOVARIANCE; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; IMAGE VARIOGRAMS; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; SPATIAL STATISTICS;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 0024666071     PISSN: 01962892     EISSN: 15580644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/36.17666     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. A. C. Strahler, X. Li, C.E. Woodcock, and D.L.B. Jupp, “Discrete-object modeling of remotely sensed scenes,” in Proc. 19th Int. Symp. Remote Sensing Environ. (Paris, France), Oct. 1-5, 1984, pp. 465–473, 1985.
2. D.L.B. Jupp, A.H. Strahler, and C.E. Woodcock, “Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images I. Basic Theory,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 463–473, July 1988.
3. G. Matheron, “Principles of geostatistics,” Economic Geology, vol. 58, pp. 1246–1266, 1963.
4. G. Matheron, Les Variables Regionalisees et Leur Estimation. Paris: Mas-son et Cie., 1965.
5. G. Matheron, “The theory of regionalized variables and its applications,” in Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematiaue de Fontainebleau, no. 5, 1971.
6. L.S. Gandin, Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields. Springfield, VA, translated from Russian by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1963.
7. G.H. Jowett, “Sampling properties of local statistics in stationary stochastic series,” Biometrika, vol. 42, pp. 160–169, 1955.
8. C.J. Huijbregts, “Regionalized variables and quantitative analysis of spatial data,” in Display and Analysis of Spatial Data, J.C. Davis and M.J. McCullagh, Eds. London: Wiley, 1975, pp. 38–53.
9. C.E. Woodcock, “Understanding spatial variation in remotely sensed imagery,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, 1985.
10. C.E. Woodcock, A.H. Strahler, and D.L.B. Jupp, “The use of variograms in remote sensing I: Scene models and simulated images,” Remote Sensing Environ., vol. 25, pp. 323–348, 1988.
11. C.E. Woodcock, “The use of variograms in remote sensing II: Real digital images,” Remote Sensing Environ., vol. 25, pp. 349–379, 1988.
12. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. London: Academic, 1982.
13. C.E. Woodcock and A.H. Strahler, “The factor of scale in remote sensing,” Remote Sensing Environ., vol. 21, pp. 311–322, 1987.
14. A.H. Strahler, C.E. Woodcock, and J.A. Smith, “On the nature of models in remote sensing,” Remote Sensing Environ., vol. 20, pp. 121–139, 1986.
15. P. Grieg-Smith, “The use of random and contiguous quadrats in the study of the structure of plant communities,” Ann. Bot., I. S., vol. 16, pp. 293–316, 1952.
16. M.O. Hill, “The intensity of spatial pattern in plant communities,” J. Ecol., vol. 61, pp. 225–235, 1973.
17. H. Moellering and W. Tobler, “Geographical variances,” Geog. Anal., vol. 4, pp. 35–50, 1972.
18. H. Fairfield Smith, “An empirical law describing the heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops,” J. Agric. Sei., vol. 28, pp. 1–23, 1938.
19. F. Garwood, “The variance of the overlap of geometrical figures with reference to a bombing problem,” Biometrika, vol. 34, pp. 1–17, 1947.
20. H.R. Thompson, “A note on contagious distributions,” Biometrika, vol. 41, pp. 268–271, 1954.
21. X. Li and A.H. Strahler, “Geometric-optical modeling of a conifer forest canopy,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. GE-23, no. 5, pp. 705–721, Sept. 1985.
22. X. Li, “Geometric-optical bidirectional reflectance modeling of a coniferous forest canopy,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, vol. GE-24, no. 6, pp. 906–919, Nov. 1986.
23. D.L.B. Jupp, J. Walker, and L.K. Penridge, “Interpretation of vegetation structure in Landsat MSS imagery: A case study in disturbed semi-arid eucalypt woodlands. Part 2. Model-based analysis,” J. Environ. Management, vol. 23, pp. 35–57, 1986.