Failure-censored variables-sampling plans for lognormal and weibull distributions

Technometrics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1989, Pages 199-206

  Schneider, Helmut ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance sampling; Life data; Quality control; Type II censoring

Indexed keywords

FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS--MONTE CARLO METHODS; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; TYPE II CENSORING;

SAMPLING;

EID: 0024656381     PISSN: 00401706     EISSN: 15372723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1989.10488513     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cohen, A. C. Jr. (1961). “Tables for Maximum Likelihood Estimates: Singly Truncated and Singly Censored Samples,” Technometrics, 3, 535-541.
2. David, H. A. (1981). Order Statistics. New York: John Wiley.
3. Escobar, L. A., and Meeker, W. Q. (1986), “Elements of the Fisher Information Matrix for the Smallest Extreme Value Distrihution and Censored Data: Algorithm AS 218.” Applied Starrisrics. 35. 80-86.
4. Gupta, A. K. (l852), “Estimation of the Mean and Standard Deviation of a Normal Population From a Censored Sample.” Biometrika, 39. 260-273.
5. Harter, H. L. (1970). Order Statistics and Their Use in Testing and Estimation
6. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Harter, H. L., and Moore, A. H. (1966). “Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of Normal Populations From Singly and Doubly Censored Samples,” Biometrika. 53. 205-213.
8. Hosono, Y. Okta, H. and Kasc, S. (1967), “Design of Single Sampling Plans for Doubly Exponential Characteristics.” in Frontiers in Staristical Quality Control. eds. H. J. Lcnz. G. B. Wetherill, and P. T. Wilrich, Wurzburg, West Germany: PhysicaVerlag, 94-112.
9. Larson, H. R. (1966), “A Nomographof the Cumulative Binomial Distribution,” Industrial Quality Control, 23, 270-277.
10. Lieberman, G. J., and Resnikoff, G. J. (1955), “Sampling Plans for Inspection by Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 457-516.
11. Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. (1970), Biometrika Tables for Statisticians (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.), Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
12. Schilling, E. G. (1982), Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control, New York: Marcel Dekker.
13. Schneider, H. (1986), Truncated and Censored Samples From Normal Populations, New York: Marcel Dekker.
14. Schneider, H. (1987), “Censored Variables Sampling Plans for Lognormal Distributions,” technical report, Louisiana State University, Dept. of Quantitative Business Analysis.
15. Schneider, H., and Weissfeld, L. (1986), “Inference Based on Type II Censored Samples,” Biometrics, 42, 531-536.
16. U.S. Department of Defense (1957), Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Defective: MIL-STD-414, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. U.S. Department of Defense (1963), Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes: MIL-STD-IOSD. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. U.S. Department of Defense (1965), “Factors and Procedures for Applying MIL-STD- 105D Sampling Plans to Life and Reliability Testing, Quality Control and Reliability Assurance,” Technical Report 7, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Installations and Logistics),Washington, DC.
19. Wallis, W. A. (1947), “Use of the Variables in Acceptance Inspection for Percent Defective,” in Techniques of Statistical Analysis, eds. C. Eisenhart, M. Hastay, and W. A. Wallis, New York: McGraw-Hill,. 17.