AGM: A Dataflow Database Machine

ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1989, Pages 114-146

  Bic, Lubomir ^a   Hartmann, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

ACTIVE GRAPH MACHINE; AGM MODEL; DATABASE MACHINES; DATAFLOW COMPUTING;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0024620684     PISSN: 03625915     EISSN: 15574644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/62032.62037     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Agrawal, R., and DeWitt, D. J. Whither hundreds of processors in a database machine? In International Workshop On High-Level Architecture (Los Angeles Calif., 1984). Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Maryland, 1984, pp. 6.21–6.32.
2. Agrawal, R., and DeWitt, D. J. Recovery architectures for multiprocessor database machines. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD (Austin, Tex., 1985), ACM, New York, 1985. pp. 131–145.
3. Arvind, Gostelow, K. P., AND Plouffe, W. An asynchronous programming language and computing machine. In Tech. Rep. TR-114a, Dept. of Information and Computer Science, Univ. of California, Irvine, Dec. 1978.
4. Bic, L., and Hartmann, R. L. Simulated performance of a data-driven database machine. J. Paral. Distrib. Comput. 3, 2 (Mar. 1986), 1-22.
5. Chamberlin, D. D. Relational data base management systems. ACM Comput. Suru. 8,1 (Mar. 1976), 43-66.
6. Chen, P. P. The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1, 1 (Mar. 1976).
7. Codd, E. F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13, 6 (June 1970), 377-387.
8. Codd, E. F. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 4 (Dec. 1979), 397-434.
9. Franaszek, P., and Robinson, J. T. Limitations on concurrency in transaction processing. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 10, 1 (Mar. 1985), 1-28.
10. Hartmann, R. L. A data-driven database model and its implementation on a highly-parallel architecture. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of ICS, University of California, Irvine, 1987.
11. Kleissner, K., AND Stumptner, M. Performance of concurrency control algorithms in distributed databases. Unpublished report. Dept. of Computer Science, Technical Univ. of Vienna, Vienna.
12. Schuster, S. A., et al. RAP.2—An associative processor for data bases. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual IEEE Symposium for Computer Architecture (Palo Alto, Calif., April, 1978). IEEE, New York, 1978, pp. 52-59.
13. Special Issue on Dataflow Systems. IEEE Comput. 15, 2 (Feb. 1982).
14. Shoshani, A. CABLE: A language based on the entity-relationship model. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, Cal., 1978.
15. Taylor, R. W., and Frank, R. L. CODASYL database management systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1 (Mar. 1976).
16. Treleaven, P. C., Brownbridge, T. R., and Hopkins, R. C. Data-driven and demand-driven computer architecture. ACM Comput. Surv. 14, 1 (Mar. 1982), 93-143.
17. Tsichritzis, D. C., and Lochovsky, F. H. Hierarchical database management: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1 (Mar. 1976).