Sheepfarming after chernobyl a case study in communicating scientific information

Environment

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1989, Pages 10-39

  Wynne, Brian ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESIUM 137;

AGRICULTURE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; SHEEP; UNITED KINGDOM;

OVIS ARIES;

DECISION-MAKING STRUCTURE; SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION; SHEEP FARMING;

UK, ENGLAND(NORTHWEST);

EID: 0024483488     PISSN: 00139157     EISSN: 19399154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00139157.1989.9928930     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Harry Otway, P. Haastrup, W. Cannell, G. Gianitsopoulos, and M. Paruccini, An Analysis of the Print Media in Europe Following the Chernobyl Accident, EUR-11043 EN (Ispra, Italy: Joint Research Centre of the Commission of the European Community, 1987); Harry Otway, “Risk Communication, Experts and Democracy,” Risk Analysis 7(1987): 125-129;
2. J. Clarence Davies, Vincent Covello, and Fred Allen, eds., Risk Communication (Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation, 1987); Harold Sharlin, “EDB: A Case Study in Communicating Risk,’’ Risk Analysis 6(1986):61-68;
3. Thomas Belton, Robert Roundy, and Neil Weinstein, “Urban Fishermen: Managing the Risks of Toxic Exposure,” Environment, November 1986. 18-37.
4. Robert Paine, “Accidents, Ideologies and Routines: ‘Chernobyl’ over Norway,” Anthropology Today 2(1987):7-10;
5. F. B. Smith, “The Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident” (Bracknell, U.K.: U.K. Meteorological Office, May 1987, mimeographed), 18.
6. F. B. Smith and M. Clark, “Deposition of Radionuclides from the Chernobyl Cloud,” Nature 322(1986):690-691;