Postdate fetal surveillance: Is 41 weeks too early?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 1989, Pages 91-93

  Guidetti, Denise A ^a   Divon, Michael Y ^a   Langer, Oded ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

antepartum fetal testing; Postdate pregnancy

Indexed keywords

FETUS; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTMATURITY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, PROLONGED;

EID: 0024327327     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90240-8     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Postmaturity
2. Placental insufficiency in relation to postterm pregnancy and fetal postmaturity
3. Fetal surveillance vs. labor induction at 42 weeks in postterm gestation
4. Predictability of complications associated with prolongation of pregnancy
5. Asphyxia and gestational age
6. Antepartum testing in postterm pregnancy
7. Prolonged pregnancy. I. Observations concerning the causes of fetal distress
8. Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdate pregnancies
9. Morbidity and mortality of advanced gestational age: post-term or postmature
10. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocimetry in postdate pregnancies