Extraneous factors affecting resistive index

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 1988, Pages 899-904

  Pozniak, Myron A ^a   Kelcz, Frederick ^a   Stratta, Robert J ^a   Oberley, Terry D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WILLIAM S MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Doppler studies; Renal transplantation; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; DOG; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMAL; DOGS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL VEINS; ULTRASONICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 0024237755     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198812000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rifkin MD. Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex doppler examination: value of the resistive index. AJR 1987;148: 759-762.
2. Rigsby CM. Renal allografts in acute rejection: evaluation using duplex sonography. Radiology 1986;158:375-378.
3. Rigsby CM. Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1987;162:39-42.
4. Pearce RB. Duplex ultrasound identifies renal allograft rejection. Diagnostic Imaging 1987;9:11-16.
5. d’Agincourt. Image modes help ensure organ transplant success. Diagnostic Imaging 1987;9:64-73.
6. Buckley AR. The distinction between acute renal transplant rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity: value of duplex sonography. AJR 1987;149:521-525.
7. Porter KA. Renal transplantation. In: Heptinstall RH, ed. Pathology of the kidney, vol 3, ed 2. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1983:1455-1547.
8. Lensmeyer GL. Identification and analysis of nine metabolites of cyclosporine in whole blood by liquid chromatography. I: Purification of analytical standards and optimization of the assay. Clinical Chemistry 1987;33:1841-1850.
9. Hildell J. Ultrasonography in complications of renal transplantation. Acta Radiologica [Diagn] 1984;25:299-304.
10. Slovis TL. Renal transplant rejection: sonographic evaluation in children. Radiology 1984;153:659-665.
11. Hillman BJ. Correlation of echographic and histologic findings in suspected renal allograft rejection. Radiology 1979;132:673-676.
12. Hricak H. The renal sinus during allograft rejection: sonographic and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1982;142:693-699.
13. Hricak H. Acute post-transplantation renal failure: differential diagnosis by ultrasound. Radiology 1981;139:441-449.
14. Griffin JF. Diagnosis of disease in renal allografts: correlation between ultrasound and histology. Clin Radiol 1986;37:59-62.
15. Sampson D. Ultrasonic method for detecting rejection of human renal allotransplants. Lancet 1969;2:976-978.
16. Arima M. Analysis of the arterial blood flow patterns of normal and allografted kidneys by the directional ultrasonic doppler technique. J Urol 1978;122:587-591.
17. Arima M. Predictability of renal allograft prognosis during rejection crisis by ultrasonic doppler flow technique. Urology 1982;19:389- 394.
18. Berland LL. Evaluation of renal transplants with pulsed Doppler duplex sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1:215-222.
19. Berland LL. Evaluation of canine renal transplants with pulsed doppler duplex sonography. J Surg Res 1985;39:433-438.
20. Johnston KW. Validation of the role of pulsatibility index in quantitation of the events of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Am J Surg 1976;131:295-297.