Response-surface designs for quantitative and qualitative variables

Technometrics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 423-428

  Draper, Norman R ^a   John, J A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Classification variable; Composite design; Dummy variable; Experimental design; Factorial design

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES--ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

CLASSIFICATION VARIABLE; COMPOSITE DESIGN; FACTORIAL DESIGN; RESPONSE-SURFACE DESIGNS;

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS;

EID: 0024107086     PISSN: 00401706     EISSN: 15372723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1988.10488437     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1982), “Measures of Lack of Fit for Response Surface Design and Predictor Variable Transformations," Technometrics, 24, 1-8.
2. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, New York: John Wiley.
3. Box, G. E. P., and Hunter, J. S. (1957), “Multi-factor Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 195-241.
4. Cox, D. R. (1984), “Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views: Design of Experiments and Regression,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A. 147, 306-315.
5. Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981), Applied Regression Analysis(2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.