Pilot-plant evaluation of porous biomass supports

Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States)

Volumn 114, Issue 5, 1988, Pages 1077-1096

  Heidman, James A ^a   Brenner, Richard C ^a   Shah, Hemang J ^b  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS;

BIOMASS SUPPORTS; CAPTOR BIOMASS SUPPORT SYSTEM; OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY;

WASTEWATER;

DISSOLVED OXYGEN;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOMASS; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

EID: 0024095993     PISSN: 07339372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1988)114:5(1077)     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Atkinson, B., Black, G. M., and Pinches, A. (1980). “Process intensification using cell support systems.” Process Biochem., 15(4), 24-32.
2. Atkinson, B., Black, G. M., and Pinches, A. (1981). “The characteristics of solid supports and biomass support particles when used in fluidised beds.” Biological fluidised bed treatment of water and wastewater, P. F. Cooper and B. Atkinson, eds., Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England, 75-106.
3. Atkinson, B., et al. (1979). “Biological particles of given size, shape, and density for use in biological reactors.” Biotech, andBioengrg., 21(2), 193-200.
4. Boon, A. G., and Cooper, P. F. (1982). Project No. 1800 Captor. Water Research Centre, Stevenage, England.
5. Boyle, W. C, and Wallace, A. T. (1986). “Status of porous biomass support systems for wastewater treatment: an innovative/alternative technology assessment.” EPA-600/2-86/019, NTIS No. PB86-1569657/AS, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
6. Captor waste water treatment with CSP. (1981). Simon-Hartley Ltd., Stokeon-Trent, England.
7. Cooper, P. F., et al. (1986). “Evaluation of the Captor process for uprating an overloaded sewage works.” Process engineering aspects of immobolised cell systems, C. Webb, C. M. Black, and B. Atkinson, eds., Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, England.
8. Cooper, P. F. (1988). “Demonstration and evaluation of the Captor process for sewage treatment.” Final report, EPA Cooperative Agreement CR810911, prepared by Water Research Centre, Stevenage, England, for U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, in press.
9. Heidman, J. A. (1986). “Municipal wastewater treatment using the Captor process.” Proc. 10th U. S. lJapan Conf. on Sewage Treatment and NATO/CCMS Conf., EPA/600/9-86/015b, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 518-534.
10. "Methods of chemical analysis of water and wastes.” (1979). EPA-60014-79-020, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
11. Patterson, W. L., and Banker, R. F. (1971). “Estimating costs and manpower requirements for conventional wastewater treatment facilities.” EPA-17090 DAN, NTIS No. PB-211132, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
12. Redman, D. T., Boyle, W. C, and Ewing, L. (1983). “Oxygen transfer efficiency measurements in mixed liquor using off-gas techniques.” J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 55(11), 1338-1347.
13. A standard for the measurement of oxygen transfer in clean water. (1984). ASCE, New York, N. Y.
14. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. (1985). 16th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D. C.
15. Walker, I., and Austin, E. P. (1981). “The use of plastic, porous biomass supports in a pseudofluidised bed for effluent treatment.” Biological fiuidised bed treatment of water and wastewater, P. F. Cooper and B. Atkinson, eds., Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England, 272-284.