Confidence Intervals for the Signal-to-Noise Ratio When a Signal Embedded in Noise is Observed Over Repeated Trials

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 1988, Pages 646-649

  Raz, Jonathan ^a   Turetsky, Bruce ^a   Fein, George ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING -- ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; NOISE EMBEDDED SIGNAL; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THEORETICAL STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMAN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0024061492     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/10.4598     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. N. J. Bershad and A. J. Rockmore, “On estimating signal-to-noise ratio using the sample correlation coefficient,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-20, pp. 112-113, 1974.
2. E. Callaway and R. A. Halliday, “Evoked potential variability: Effects of age, amplitude and methods of measurement,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 34, pp. 125-133, 1973.
3. R. Coppola, R. Tabor, and M. S. Buchsbaum, “Signal to noise ratio and response variability measurements in single trial evoked potentials,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 44, pp. 214-222, 1978.
4. C. Elberling and M. Don, “Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses,” Scand. Audiol., vol. 13, pp. 187-197, 1984.
5. E. L. Lehmann, Theory of Point Estimation. New York: Wiley, 1983.
6. J. Mocks, T. Gasser, and P. D. Tuan, “Variability of single evoked potentials evaluated by two new statistical tests,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 57, pp. 571-580, 1984.
7. B. I. Turetsky, J. Raz, and G. Fein, “Noise and signal power and their effects on evoked potential estimation,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., to be published.