An experimental test of risk compensation: Between-subject versus within-subject analyses

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 277-287

  Streff, Fredrick M ^a   Geller, E Scott ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; HUMAN; RISK; SAFETY; SEATBELT; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCELERATION; ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; HUMAN; RISK-TAKING; SAFETY; SEAT BELTS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0024058661     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(88)90055-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A utility maximization model of driver traffic safety behavior
2. Safety benefits of the 55 MPH speed limit
3. Human behavior feedback and traffic safety
4. Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accident data
5. Risk, especially risk of traffic accident
6. Critique of Sam Peltzman's study
7. Perceived risks and driving behavior
8. Seat belt use under voluntary and mandatory conditions and its effect on casualties
9. Seat belt usage rates: A test of Peltzman's hypothesis
10. Do safety measure really work? An examination of risk homeostasis theory
11. Evidence and assumptions relevant to risk homeostasis
12. A decision theory model of danger compensation
13. Mandatory belt use and driver risk taking: An empirical evaluation of the risk compensation hypothesis
14. The effects of automobile safety regulation
15. Driver's galvanic skin response and risk of accident
16. The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health
17. Critical issues in risk homeostasis theory
18. Assumptions necessary and unnecessary to risk homeostasis
19. Notes on the interpretation of traffic accident data and of risk homeostasis theory: A reply to L. Evans
20. Risk homeostasis in an experimental context