Feedback Stabilization and Tracking of Constrained Robots

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 1988, Pages 419-426

  Mcclamroch, N Harris ^a   Wang, Danwei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEMS, LINEAR; CONTROL SYSTEMS, NONLINEAR; DYNAMICS; ROBOTS, INDUSTRIAL - MANIPULATORS; SYSTEM STABILITY;

CONSTRAINED DYNAMIC EQUATIONS; CONSTRAINED ROBOTS; GLOBAL TRACKING; LINEAR FEEDBACK; NONLINEAR FEEDBACK;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 0024014968     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: 15582523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/9.1220     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. H. Asada and N. Goldfine, “Optimal compliance design for grinding robot tool holders,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, St. Louis, MO, 1985, pp. 316-322.
2. “Compliance analysis and tool holder design for grinding with robots,” in Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., Boston, MA, 1985, pp. 65-68.
3. L. Gustafsson, “Deburring with industrial robots,” presented at the SME Deburring and Surface Conditioning Conf., 1983.
4. N. Hogan and S. R. Moore, “Part referenced manipulation-A strategy applied to robotic drilling,” in Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meet., Boston, MA, 1983, pp. 183-191.
5. G. Plant and G. Hirzinger, “Controlling a robot's motion speed by a force-torque sensor for deburring problems,” in Proc. IFIC/IFAP Symp. Inform. Contr. Problems in Manufacturing Technol., 1982, pp. 97-102.
6. T. M. Stepien, et al., “Control of tool/workpiece contact force with application to robotic deburring,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, St. Louis, MO, 1985.
7. G. P. Starr, “Edge following with a Puma 560 manipulator using VAL-II,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1986, pp. 379-383.
8. N. Hogan, “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part I- Theory; Part II-Implementation; Part III-Applications,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Measurement Contr., vol. 107, 1985.
9. H. Kazerooni, et al., “Robust compliant motion for manipulators; Part I: The fundamental concepts of compliant motion; Part II: Design methods,” in Proc. IEEE J. Robotics Automation, vol. RA-2, pp. 83-92, June 1986.
10. R. P. Paul and B. Shimano, “Compliance and control,” in Proc. Joint Automat. Contr. Conf, 1976, pp. 694-699.
11. J. K. Salisbury, “Active stiffness control of a manipulator in Cartesian coordinates,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Contr., Albuquerque, NM, 1980, pp. 95-100.
12. J. J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986.
13. G. Hirzinger, “Force feedback problems in robotics,” presented at the IASTED Symp. on Modelling, Identification and Contr., Davos, 1982.
14. “Direct digital robot control using a force torque sensor,” in Proc. IFAC Symp. Real Time Digital Contr. Appl., 1983, pp. 243-255.
15. M. T. Mason, “Compliance and force control for computer-controlled manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man., Cybern., vol. SMC-11, 1981.
16. M. H. Raibert and J. J. Craig, “Hybrid position/force control of manipulators,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Measurement Contr., vol. 102, pp. 126-133, 1981.
17. H. West and H. Asada, “A method for the design of hybrid position/ force controllers for manipulators constrained by contact with the environment,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, St. Louis, MO, 1985.
18. D. Whitney, “Force feedback control of manipulator fine motions,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Measurement Contr., pp. 91-97, 1971.
19. “Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, St. Louis, MO, 1985, pp. 262-268.
20. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.
21. D. T. Greenwood, Principles of Dynamics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965.
22. H. Hemami and B. F. Wyman, “Modelling and control of constrained dynamic systems with application to biped locomotion in the frontal plane,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-24, pp. 526-535, 1979.
23. H. P. Huang, “Constrained manipulators and contact force control of contour following problems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Elect. Eng. Comput. Sci., Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, July 1986.
24. R. Kankaanranta and H. N. Koivo, ‘ ‘A model for constrained motion of a serial link manipulator,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1986.
25. N. H. McClamroch, “Singular systems of differential equations as dynamic models for constrained robot systems,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1986.
26. N. H. McClamroch and H. P. Huang, “Dynamics of a closed chain manipulator,” in Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf, Boston, MA, 1985.
27. T. Yoshikawa, “Dynamic hybrid position/force control of robot manipulators-description of hand constraints and calculation of joint driving forces,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics Automation, San Francisco, CA, 1986, pp. 1393-1398.
28. M. Takegaki and S. Arimoto, “A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators,” J. Dynam. Syst., Measurement Contr., vol. 102, pp. 119-125, 1981.
29. N. H. McClamroch and D. Wang, “Feedback stabilization and tracking of constrained robots,” Center for Research in Integrated Manufacturing, Robot Syst. Division, Univ. Michigan, RSD-25, Oct. 1986.
30. S. D. Eppinger and W. P. Seering, “Introduction to dynamic models for robot force control,” IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 48-52, Apr. 1987.
31. J. Y. S. Luh, “Conventional controller design for industrial robots-A tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. SMC-11, pp. 298316, 1983.