Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 240-252

  Getty, David J ^a   Pickett, Ronald M ^b   D’Orsi, Carl J ^c   Swets, John A ^a  

^a BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted classification; Diagnostic accuracy; Diagnostic aids; Feature analysis; Image based diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY;

FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0023948342     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198804000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Shiftman SS, Reynolds ML, Young FW. Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1981.
2. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1982.
3. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted Huntington, New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co, 1974.
4. Swets JA. The relative operating characteristic in psychology. Science 1973;182:990-1000.
5. Swets JA. ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1979;14:109-121.
6. Swets JA, Pickett RM, Whitehead SF, et al. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Science 1979;205:753-759.
7. Swets JA. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. Psychol Bull 1986:100-117.
8. Swets JA. Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychol Bull 1986:181-198.
9. Macmillan NA, Kaplan HL. Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychol Bull 1985;95:185-199.
10. Begg CB, Greenes RA. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Biometrics 1983;39:207-215.
11. Greenes RA, Begg CB. Assessment of diagnostic technologies: methodologies for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients. Invest Radiol 1985;20:751-756.
12. Metz CE, Wang P-L, Kronman HB. A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data. In: Deconinck F ed., Information processing in medical imaging. The Hague: Martijnus Nijhoff, 1984:431-445.
13. Sickles EA. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 1986;160:289-293.
14. Swets JA, Swets JB. ROC approach to cost-benefit analysis. IEEE Proc Sixth Conf on Computer Applic in Radiol, Newport Beach, California, 1979;203-206. Reprinted in Ripley K L, Murray A eds. Introduction to automated arrhythmia detection. New York: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1980:57-60.
15. Moskowitz M. Screening for breast cancer: how effective are our tests? A critical review. CA 1983;33:26-27.
16. Egan RL. Present status of mammography. Ann NY Acad Sci 1964;114:794-802.
17. Clark RL, Copeland MM, Egan RL, et al. Reproducibility of the technic of mammography (Egan) for cancer of the breast. AJS 1965;109:127-133.
18. Thomas JM, Fitzharris BM, Redding WH, et al. Clinical examination xeromammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast tumors. Br Med J 1978;2:1139-1141.
19. Karsell PR. Mammography at the Mayo Clinic: a year’s experience. Mayo Clin Proc 1974;49:954-957.
20. Newell RR, Chamberlain WE, Rigler L. Descriptive classification of pulmonary shadows: a relevation of unreliability in the roentgeno- graphic diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am Rev Tubercul 1954;I9: 566-584.
21. Jacobson G, Lainhart WS. ILOU/C 1971 international classification of radiographs of the pneumoconioses. Medical Radiography and Photography 1972;48:65-110.
22. Lodwick GS. Computer diagnosis in radiology. Journal of the Michigan State Medical Society 1962;61:1239-1242.
23. Haberman JD. Mass screening for breast cancer by electronic infrared pattern recognition. Phase II Final Report. Oklahoma City, OK: The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1980.
24. Dawes RM, Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psychol Bull 1974;81:95-106.
25. Kruger RP, Townes JR, Hall DL, Dwyer SJ, Lodwick GS. Automated radiographic diagnosis via feature extraction and classification of cardiac size and descriptors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1971;19:174-196.
26. Tully RJ, Conner RW, Harlow CA, Lodwick GS. Towards computer analysis of pulmonary infiltration. Invest Radiol 1978; 13:198-205.
27. Egan RL. Estimated risk and occurrence of breast cancer in asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic patients. Cancer 1979;43:871-877.
28. Coomans D, Broeckaert I, Derde MP, Tassin A, Massart DL, Wold S. Use of a microcomputer for the definition of multivariate confi-dence regions in medical diagnosis based on clinical laboratory profiles. Comput Biomed Res 1984;17:1-14.
29. Lodwick GS. Computers in radiologic diagnosis. Applied Radiology 1986;61-65.
30. Swets JA. Assessment of non-destructive-testing systems, part 1; the relationship of true and false detections; assessment of nondestructive-testing systems, part II: indices of performance. Materials Evaluation 1983;41:1294-1303.