Comparison of conventional and Split-course radiotherapy as primary treatment in carcinoma of the larynx

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 147-152

  Overgaard, J ^a   Hjelm Hansen, M ^a   Johansen, L Vendelbo ^a   Andersen, A P ^a  

^a DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Comparison conventional vs split course; Fistulas; Laryngeal cancer; Oedema; Therapeutic radiology; Tumour control

Indexed keywords

EDEMA; HUMAN; LARYNX CARCINOMA; LARYNX FISTULA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RADIOTHERAPY;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE;

EID: 0023909491     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841868809090334     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. A quantitative study of late radiation effect on normal skin and subcutaneous tissues in human beings
2. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx: Results of radiation treatment and some prognostic factors
3. Tumor cell repopulation in the rest interval of split-course radiation treatment
4. A cell population kinetic model for fractionated radiation therapy. I. Normal tissues
5. Cell kinetics and radiation biology
6. What next in fractionated radiotherapy
7. Potential for increasing the differential response between tumors and normal tissues: Can proliferation rate be used
8. Laryngeal carcinoma. IV
9. Laryngeal carcinoma. II
10. Clinical experiences with altered fractionation
11. The influence of the number of fractions and of overall treatment time on local control and late complication rate in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx
12. Misonidazole combined with split-course radiotherapy in the treatment of invasive carcinoma of the larynx and the pharynx
13. Primary radiotherapy of larynx and pharynx carcinoma—An analysis of some factors influencing local control and survival
14. A re-evaluation of split-course technique for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
15. Radiotherapy employing three fractions on each of twelve consecutive days
16. Radiation response of C3H mouse mammary carcinoma evaluated in terms of cellular radiation sensitivity
17. Acceleratd fractionation vs hyperfractionation: Rationales for several treatments per day
18. What is known about tumour proliferation rates to choose between accelerated fractionation of hyperfractionation
19. Pharyngo-cutaneous fistulae following laryngectomy
20. Twice-a-day radiation therapy for cancer of the head and neck
21. The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy