Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech

Laryngoscope

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 394-397

  Pindzola, Rebekah ^a   Cain, Blanche H ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPEECH; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL SPEECH;

AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0023908351     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198804000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Clark, J. and Stemple, J.: Assessment of Three Modes of Alaryngeal Speech with a Synthetic Sentence Identification (SSI) Task in Varying Message-to-Competition Ratios. J. Speech Hear. Res., 25:333-338,1982.
2. Dudley, B. L. and Robbins, J.: An Intelligibility Study of Tracheoesophageal Puncture. Paper Presented at Annual Convention of Amer. Speech-Lang. Hear. Assoc., Detroit, MI, 1980.
3. Clark, J.: Alaryngeal Speech Intelligibility and the Older Listener. J. Speech Hear. Dis., 50:60-65, 1985.
4. Merwin, G. E., Goldstein, L. P. and Rothman, H. B.: A Comparison of Speech Using Artificial Larynx sud Tracheoesophageal Puncture with Valve in the Same Speaker. Laryngoscope, 95:730-734, 1985.
5. Tardy-Mitzell, M. A., Andrews, M. L. and Bowman, S. A.: Acceptability and Intelligibility of Tracheoesophageal Speech. Arch. Otolaryngol., 111:213-215,1985.
6. Fleming, S. M., Simpson, M. L. and Weaver, A. W.: A Comparison of Four Types of Laryngectomized Speech Rehabilitation. Paper Presented at Annual Convention of Amer. Speech-Lang. Hear. Assoc., Washington, DC, 1985.
7. Williams, S. E. and Watson, J. B.: Differences in Speaking Proficiencies in Three Laryngectomee Groups. Arch. Otolaryngol., 111:216-219,1985.
8. Black, J. W. and Haagen, C. H.: Multiple-Choice Intelligibility Tests, Forms A and B. J. Speech Hear. Dis., 28:77-86,1963.
9. Winer, B. J.:Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
10. Goldstein, L. P. and Rothman, H. B.: Analysis of Speech Produced with an Artificial Larynx. Paper Presented at Annual Convention of Amer. Speech-Lang. Hear. Assoc., Houston, TX, 1976.
11. Bennett, S. and Weinberg, B.: Acceptability Ratings of Normal, Esophageal, and Artificial Larynx Speech. J. Speech Hear. Res., 16:608-616,1973.
12. Robbins, J., Fisher, H. B., Blom, E. C., et al. A Comparative Acoustic Study of Normal, Esophageal, and Tracheoesophageal Speech Production. J. Speech Hear. Dis., 49:202-210,1984.