The validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed questionnaire system to evaluate at-risk infants

Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1988, Pages 55-68

  Bricker, Diane ^a   Squires, Jane ^a   Kaminski, Ruth ^a   Mounts, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; At risk; Infants; Parent report

Indexed keywords

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COST; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; INFANT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; MALE; PARENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.;

EID: 0023890329     PISSN: 01468693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/13.1.55     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corp.
2. Brinker, R. (1976). Predicting children’s classroom behavior from teachers’ classroom behavior and psychometric descriptions of children (Doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 76, 21618-25894.
3. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-47.
4. Coplan, J. (1982). Parents’ estimate of child’s developmental level in high-risk population. American Journal of Diseases of Children, ¡36, 101-104.
5. Donnelly, B., Doherty, J., Sheehan, R., & Whittemore, C. (1982, December). A comparison of maternal, paternal, and diagnostic evaluations of typical and atypical infants. Paper presented at HCEEP/DEC Conference, Washington, DC.
6. Drillien, C., Thomson, A., & Burgoyne, K. (1980). Low-birthweight children at early schoolage: A longitudinal study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22, 26-47.
7. Finnegan, L. (1985). Smoking and its effect on pregnancy and the newborn. In S. Harel & N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/socio/medical aspects (pp. 127-136). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8. Frankenburg, W., Coons, C., & Ker, C. (1982). Screening infants and preschoolers to identify school learning problems. In E. Edgar, N. Haring, J. Jenkins, & C. Pious (Eds.), Mentally handicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
9. Frankenburg, W., Van Doominck, W., Liddell, T., & Dick, N. (1976). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics, 57, 744-753.
10. French, J. (1985). Postnatal screening for hereditary and metabolic disorders. In S. Harel & N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/socio/medical aspects (pp. 171-177). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
11. Gradel, K., Thompson, M., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Parental and professional agreement in early childhood assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, I, 31-40.
12. Hagekull, B., Bohlin, G., & Lindhagen, K. (1984). Validity of parental reports. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 77-92.
13. Hayden, A., & Beck, G. (1982). The epidemiology of high-risk and handicapped infants. In C. Ramey & P. Trohanis (Eds.), Finding and educating high-risk and handicapped infants. Baltimore: University Park Press.
14. Heinrichs, W. (1983). Reproductive hazards of the workplace and the home. In R. Pitkin & J. Scott (Eds.), Clinical observations and gynecology: Pharmacology and environmental toxicology of pregnancy (Vol. 26). Philadelphia: Harper & Row.
15. Hollenbeck, A. (1978). Problems of reliability in observational research. In G. Sackett (Ed.), Observing behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 79-98). Baltimore: University Park Press.
16. Holmes, D., Reich, J., & Pasternak, J. (1984). The development of infants bom at risk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Hunt, J., & Paraskevopoulos, J. (1980). Children’s psychological development as a function of the accuracy of their mothers’ knowledge of their abilities. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 285-298.
18. Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Klein, N., Hack, M., Gallagher, J., & Fanaroff, A. (1985). Preschool performance of children with normal intelligence who were very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics, 75, 531-537.
20. Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., & Malone, A. (1980). Manual of development diagnosis: The administration and interpretation of the revised Gesell and Armatruda developmental and neurologic examination. Hagerstown: Harper & Row.
21. Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., Malone, A., Ellison, P., & Risemberg, H. (1979). The validity of parental reporting of infant development. Pediatrics, 63, 873-878.
22. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
23. Legum, C. (1985). Antenatal screening for fetal malformations and genetic disorders. In S. Harel & N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/socio/medical aspects (pp. 115-119). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24. Lipsitz, J. (1980). Adolescent psychosexual development. In P. Smith & D. Mumford (Eds.), Adolescent pregnancy: Perspectives for the health professional (pp. 1-13). Boston: G. K. Hall.
25. Meisels, S., Wiske, M., & Tivnan, T. (1984). Predicting school performance with the Early Screening Inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 25-33.
26. Michaelis, R., Haas, G., & BuchwaldSaal, M. (1985). Neurological development and assessment in infants at risk. In S. Harel & N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/socio/medical aspects (pp. 291-296). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27. National Center for Clinical Infant Program (1985). Keeping track: Tracking systems for high risk infants and young children. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Parkinson, C., Wallis, S., & Harvey, D. (1981). School achievement and behavior of children who were small-for-dates at birth. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 41-50.
29. Parmelee, A., & Cohen, S. (1985). Neonatal follow-up services for infants at risk. In S. Harel & N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/socio /medical aspects (pp. 269-274). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30. Scott, K., & Masi, W. (1979). The outcome from the utility of registers of risk. In T. Field, A. Sostek, S. Goldberg, & H. Shuman (Eds.), Infants born at risk (pp. 485-497). Jamaica: Spectrum.
31. Sexton, D., Miller, J., & Murdock, J. (1984). Correlates of parental-professional congruency scores in the assessment of young handicapped children. Journal for the Division of Early Childhood, 8(2), 99-106.
32. Shonkoff, J. (1983). The limitations of normative assessments of high-risk infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3(1), 29-43.
33. Siegel, L. (1985). Biological and environmental variables as predictors of intellectual functioning at 6 years of age. In S. Harel and N. Anastasiow (Eds.), The at-risk infant: Psycho/-socio/medical aspects. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
34. Stewart, A. (1983). Severe perinatal hazards. In M. Ritter (Ed.), Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 15-31). New York: Guildford.
35. Uzgiris, I., & Hunt, J. (1975). Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.