Breast Cancer in Women After Augmentation Mammoplasty

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 1988, Pages 681-685

  Silverstein, Melvin J ^a   Handel, Neal ^a   Gamagami, Parvis ^a   Waisman, James R ^a,b   Gierson, Eugene D ^a   Rosser, Robert J ^a,c   Steyskal, Robert ^a   Colburn, William ^a  

^a The Breast Center Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CANCER; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST CANCER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METASTASIS;

ADULT; AGED; AXILLA; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMAN; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGE; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SILICONES; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 0023889052     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300023001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Whidden P: Augmentation mammoplasty. Transplant Implant Today 1986;3:43-51.
2. Deapen MD, Pike MC, Casagrande JT, et al: The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammoplasty: An epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:361-367.
3. Hoopes JE, Edgerton MT, Shelley W: Organic synthetics for augmentation mammoplasty: Their relation to breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;39:263-270.
4. Schwartz AW, Erich JB: Experimental study of polyvinyl-formal (Ivalon) sponge as a substitute for tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 1960;25:1-14.
5. Brown JB, Fryer MP, Ohlwiler DA: Study and use of synthetic materials, such as silicons and Teflon, as subcutaneous prostheses. Plast Reconst Surg 1961;26:264-279.
6. Lilla JA, Vistnes LM: Long-term study of reactions to various silicone breast implants in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;57:637-649.
7. Wolfe JN: On mammography in the presence of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;62:286.
8. Cohen IK, Goodman H, Theogaraj SD: Xeromammography: A reason for using saline-filled breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;60: 886-888.
9. Snyder RE: Xeromammography: A reason for using saline-filled breast prostheses (The voice of polite dissent). Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;61:107.
10. Rintala AE, Svinhufvud UM: Effect of augmentation mammoplasty on mammography and thermography. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;54:390-396.
11. Wanebo HJ, Huvos AG, Urban JA: Treatment of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 1974;33:349-357.
12. Bedwani R, Vana J, Rosner D, et al: Management and survival of female patients with ‘minimal’ breast cancer. Cancer 1981;47:2769-2778.
13. Schwartz GF, Feig SA, Patchefsky AS: Clinicopathologic correlations and significance of clinically occult mammary lesions. Cancer 1978;41: 1147-1153.
14. McGrath MH, Burkhardt BR: The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74:550-560.
15. Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Hoffman RS, et al: The Breast Center: A multidisciplinary model, in Paterson AHG, Lees AW (eds): Fundamental Problems in Breast Cancer. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishing Co., 1987, chap 7.
16. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al: Ten to fourteen year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;69:349-355.
17. Verbeek ALM, Hendricks JHCL, Holland R, et al: Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. Lancet 1984;1:1224-1226.
18. Collette HJA, Day NE, Rombach JJ, et al: Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomized study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet 1984;1:1224-1226.
19. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A, et al: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: Randomized trial from the breast cancer screening working group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985;1:829-832.
20. Silverstein MJ, Rosser RJ, Gamagami P, et al: Intraductal breast carcinoma: What constitutes adequate treatment. Cancer 1987;59:1819-1824.
21. Zafrani B, Fourquet A, Vilcoq JR, et al: Conservative management of intraductal breast carcinoma with tumorectomy and radiation therapy. Cancer 1986;57:1299-1301.
22. Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Rosser RJ, et al: Hooked-wire—directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography. Cancer 1987;59:715-722.
23. Unzeitig GW, Frankl G, Ackerman M, et al: Analysis of the prognosis of minimal and occult breast cancers. Arch Surg 1983;118:1403-1404.
24. Baker LH: Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five year summary report. Ca 1982;32:4,194-225.
25. Hetter GP: Satisfactions and dissatisfactions of patients with augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;64:151-155.
26. Morgernstern L, Gleischman SH, Michel SL, et al: Relation of free silicone to human breast cancer. Arch Surg 1985;120:573-577.
27. Rosenberg AL, Schwartz GF, Feig SA, et al: Clinically occult breast lesions: Localization and significance. Radiology 1987;162:167-170.
28. Bigelow R, Smith R, Goodman PA, et al: Needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses. Arch Surg 1985;120:565-568.
29. Marrujo G, Jolly PC, Hall MH: Nonpalpable breast cancer: Needlelocalized biopsy for diagnosis and consideration for treatment. Am J Surg 1986;151:599-602.
30. Vana J, Bedwani R, Mettlin C, et al: Trends in diagnosis and management of breast cancer in the United States: From the surveys of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer 1981;48:1043-1052.