Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons?

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 208-215

  Gabbay, S ^a   Kadam, P ^a   Factor, S ^a   Cheung, T K ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPLICATION; EXPLANT; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGERY;

EID: 0023883141     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)35356-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Oyer PE Stinson EB Griepp RB Shumway NE Valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards and Hancock prostheses: comparative analysis of late morbidity and mortality Ann Thorac Surg 186 1977 301 309
2. Oyer PE Stinson EB Reitz BA Miller DC Rossiter SJ Shumway NE Long-term evaluation of the porcine xenograft bioprosthesis J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 78 1979 343 350
3. Cevese PG Galluci V Rorea M Dalla Voltra S Fasoli G Cassarotto D Heart valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis: analysis of long-term results Circulation 56 Pt 2 1977 II111
4. Oyer PE Miller DC Stinson EB Reitz BA Moreno-Cabral RJ Shumway NE Clinical durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthetic valve J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 80 1980 824 833
5. Borkon AM McIntosh CL Von Rueden TJ Morrow AG Mitral valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis: five- to ten-year follow-up Ann Thorac Surg 32 1981 127 137
6. Cohn LH Mudge GA Pratter F Collins JJ Five- to eight-year follow-up of patients undergoing porcine heart-valve replacement N Engl J Med 304 1981 258 262
7. Hammond GL Geha AS Kopf GS Hashim SW Biological versus mechanical valves J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 93 1987 182 198
8. Magilligan DJ Jr. Lewis JW Jr Jara FM Spontaneous degeneration of porcine bioprosthetic valves Ann Thorac Surg 30 1980 259 266
9. Broom ND Fatigue-induced damage in glutaraldehyde-preserved heart valve tissue J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 76 1978 202 211
10. Camillen JP Pornin B Carpentier A Structural changes of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine bioprosthetic valves Arch Pathol Lab Med 106 1982 490 496
11. Ishihara T Ferrans VJ Boyce SW Jones M Roberts WC Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients Am J Cardiol 48 1981 665 678
12. Barnhart GR Jones M Ishihara T Chavez AM Rose DM Ferrans VJ Bioprosthetic valvular fialure: clinical and pathological observations in an experimental animal model J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 83 1982 618 631
13. Nuñez L de la Llana R Aguado MG Iglesias A Larrea JL Celemín D Bioprosthetic valve endocarditis: indications for surgical intervention Ann Thorac Surg 35 1983 262 270
14. Billingham ME Ferrans VJ Boyce SW Spray TL Roberts WC Bacterial infection in implanted porcine valve heterografts: a histopathologic and ultrastructural study Sebening F Klovekorn WP Meisner H Struck E Bioprosthetic cardiac valves 1979 Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich 281
15. Schoen FD Hobson CE Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses, 1980–1983 Hum Pathol 16 1985 545 559
16. Gabbay S Bortolotti U Wasserman F Factor SM Hemodynamics and durability of mitral bioprostheses: an in-vitro study Eur Heart J 5 Suppl E 1986 65 71
17. Gabbay S Bortolotti U Wasserman F Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position: in vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 87 1984 836 844
18. Brais MP Bedard JP Goldstein W Koshal A Keon WJ Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: follow-up of up to six years Ann Thorac Surg 39 1985 106 111
19. Bailey P Sauer M Vouhé P Experience of four surgical centers with the Hancock pericardial valve Yacoub M Biologic and bioprosthetic valves 1985 Yorke Medical Books New York
20. Gabbay S Bortolotti U Wasserman F Tindel N Factor SM Long-term follow-up of the Ionescu-Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 88 1984 758 763
21. Clark RE Swanson WM Kardos JL Hagen RW Beauchamp RA Durability of prosthetic heart valves Ann Thorac Surg 26 1978 323 335
22. Yoganathan AP Corcoran WH Harrison EC Wall shear stress measurement in the near vicinity of prosthetic aortic heart valves J Biomech 2 1978 369 379
23. Gabbay S McQueen DM Yellin EL In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve bioprostheses at high flow rates J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 76 1978 771 787
24. Gabbay S McQueen DM Yellin EL In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve bioprostheses Circulation 60 Pt 2 1979 I62 I70
25. Gabbay S Yellin EL Frishman WH Frater RW In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of St. Jude Björk-Shiley and Hall-Kaster valves Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 26 1980 231 236
26. Anderson RP Bonchek LI Grunkemeier GL Lambert LE Starr A The analysis and presentation of surgical results by actuarial methods J Surg Res 16 1974 224 230
27. Ishihara T Ferrans VJ Jones M Cabin HS Roberts WC Calcific deposits developing in a bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve three days after implantation Circulation 63 1981 718 723
28. Ionescu MI The pericardial xenograft valve: mode of failure and possible remedial development Yacoub M Biologic and bioprosthetic valves 1985 Yorke Medical Books. New York 245 251
29. Gabbay S Bortolotti U Cipolletti G Wasserman F Frater RWM Factor SM The Meadox unicusp pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve: a new concept Ann Thorac Surg 37 1984 448 456
30. Gabbay S Factor SM Strom J Becker RM Frater RWM Sudden death due to cuspal dehiscence of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the mitral position J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 84 1982 313 314
31. Ghosh CS Larrieu JA Ablaza SG Grana PV Spontaneous disruption of the Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial xenograft in the mitral position J T horac C ardiovasc S urg 86 1983 784 785