Differing Interpretations by Pathologists of the pT Category and Grade of Transitional Cell Cancer of the Bladder

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 339-342

  ABEL, P D ^a,b   HENDERSON, D ^a,b   BENNETT, M K ^a,b   HALL, R R ^a,b   WILLIAMS, GORDON ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER CARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTEROBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA;

BLADDER NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; HUMAN;

EID: 0023737371     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1988.tb04361.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Should pTl transitional cell cancers of the bladder still be classified as “superficial”?
2. The significance of lamina propria invasion on the prognosis of patients with bladder tumours.
3. The accuracy of clinical vs surgical staging.
4. TNM (1978) in bladder cancer: use and abuse.
5. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence.
6. Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumours.
7. Current perspectives in the management of high grade invasive bladder cancer.