Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants

Laryngoscope

Volumn 98, Issue 10, 1988, Pages 1069-1077

  Finley, C C ^a   Weber, B A ^b   Warrs, M W ^c   Wilson, B S ^a,b   Farmer, J C ^b   Wolford, R D ^b   Merzenich, M M ^d   Lawson, D T ^a   Kenan, P D ^b   Schindler, R A ^d  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONSONANT; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VOWEL;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0023727302     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wilson, B. S. and Finley, C. C.: A Computer-Based Simula-tor of Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. ARO Abstracts, 8th Midwinter Res. Conf., St. Petersburg, FL, p. 209, 1985.
2. Wilson, B. S. and Finley, C. C.: Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Second Quarterly Progress Report. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Contract N01-NS-3- 2356, 1984.
3. Schindler, R. A., Kessler, D. K., Rebscher, S. J., et al The UCSF/Storz Multichannel Cochlear Implant: Patient Results. LARYNGOSCOPE, 96:597-603, 1986.
4. Merzenich, M. M., Rebscher, S. J., Loeb, G. E., et al.: The UCSF Cochlear Implant Project. In: Eochlear Implants in Clinical Use. W. D. Kcidel and P. Finkenzeller (Eds.). Karger, Basel, pp. 119-144, 1984.
5. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C. and Lawson, D. T.: Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Seventh Quarterly Progress Report. Nntional Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Contract N01-NS-3-2356, 1985.
6. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C. and Lawson, D. T.: Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Second Quarterly Progress Report. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Contract N01-NS-5-2396, 1986.
7. Schindler, R. A., Kessler, D. K., Rebscher, S. J., et al.: Surgical Considerations and Hearing Results with the UCSF/ Storz Cochlear Implant. LARYNGOSCOPE, 97:50-56, 1987
8. Schindler, R. A., Kessler, D. K., Rebscher, S. J., et al.: The University of California, San Francisco/Storz Cochlear Implant Program. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 19:287-305, 1986.
9. White, M. W., Merzenich, M. M. and Gardi, J. N.: Multi-channel Cochlear Implants: Channel Interactions and Processor Design. Arch. Otolaryngol., 110:493-501, 1984.
10. Owens, E., Kessler, D. K., Raggio, M., et al.: Analysis and Revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) Battery. Ear Hear., 6:280-287, 1985.
11. Gardi, J. N.: Human Brain Stem and Middle Latency Responses to Electrical Stimulation: Preliminary Observations. In: Cochlear Implants. R. A. Schindler and M. M. Merzenich (Eds.). Raven Press, New York, pp. 351-365, 1985.
12. Merzenich, M. M., Leakc-Jones, P., Vivion, M., et al.: De-velopment of Multichannel Electrodes for an Auditory Prosthesis. Fourth Quarterly Progress Report. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Contract N01-NS-7-2367, 1978.
13. Pfingst, B. E., Glass, I., Spelman, F. A., et al.: Psychophysical Studies of Cochlear Implants in Monkeys: Clinical Implications. In: Cochlear Implants. R. A. Schindler and M. M. Merzenich (Eds.). Raven Press, New York, pp. 305-321, 1985.
14. Pfingst, B. E. and Sutton, D.: Relation of Cochlear Implant Function to Histopathology in Monkeys. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 405:224-239, 1983.
15. Shannon, R. V.: Multichannel Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve in Man. II. Channel Interaction. Hear. Res., 12:1- 16, 1983.
16. Shannon, R. V.: Threshold and Loudness Functions for Pulsatile Stimulation of Cochlear Implants. Hear. Res., 18:135- 143, 1985.
17. Shannon, R. V.: Multichannel Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve in Man. I. Basic Psychophysics. Hear. Res., 11:157-189, 1983.
18. Schubert, E. D.: Some Limitations on Speech Coding for Implants. In: Cochlear Implants. R. A. Schindler and M. M. Merzenich (Eds.). Raven Press, New York, pp. 269-276, 1985.
19. Grether, C. B.: Psychoacoustic Assessment of Speech Com-munication Systems: The Diagnostic Discrimination Test. Project Themis. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Contract F44620- 69-C-0033, 1970.
20. De Filippo, C. L. and Scott, B. L.: A Method for Training and Evaluating the Reception of Ongoing Speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63:1186-1192, 1978.
21. Owens, E. and Raggio, M.: The UCSF Tracking Procedure for Evaluation and Training of Speech Reception by Hearing- Impaired Adults. J. Speech Hear. Disord., 52:120-128, 1987.
22. Tyler, R. S., Prooce, J. P. and Lowdor, M. W.: The Iowa Cochlear Implant Tests. University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Iowa City, IA, 1983.
23. White, M. W.: Formant Frequency Discrimination and Recognition in Subjects Implanted with Intracochlcar Stimulating Electrodes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 405:348-359, 1983.
24. Eddington, D. K.: Speech Recognition in Deaf Subjects with Multichannel Intracochlear Electrodes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 405:241-258, 1983.
25. Hochmair-Dcsoyor, I. J. and Burian, K.: Reimplantation of a Molded Scala Tympani Electrode: Impact on Psychophysical and Speech Discrimination Abilities. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryn- gol., 94:65-70, 1985.