Use of the connected speech test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 198-207

  Cox, Robyn M ^a   Alexander, Genevieve C ^b   Qilmore, Christine ^b   Pusakulich, Kay M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.;

EID: 0023706687     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198808000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bvrnc D Pifield D. Evaluation of hearing aid fittings for inlanls Br J Audiol 1974:8 47-54
2. Cox RM. Alexander GC Gilmorc C. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST) Ear Hear l987 (suppl) 1198-1268
3. Ferguson GA Statistical Analvsis in Psvchologv and Education New York McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1953: 140-147
4. Fletcher H. Speech and Hearing in Communication New York Van Nostrand Rcinhold Co. 1953:96
5. Killion MC. Wilbur LA. Gudmundsen Gl Inserl earphones for more interaural attenuation Hear Instrum 1985:36 (2) 34-36
6. Nunnelly J Psvchomctnc Theory New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978:229
7. Pearsons KS. Bennett RI Fidell S Speech levels in various noise environments Unitcd States Environmental Protection Agcncy. 1977: Report PPA 600/1-77-025
8. Studehaker GA. A rationalized arcsine transform. J. Speech Hear Res. 1985:28:455-462.
9. Thornton AR. Rafin MJM Specch-discnmination scores modeled as a binomial variable J Speech Hear Res 1978:21:507-518
10. Wilson RH. Caley M. Haenel JL Browning KM Northwestern I'niversitv Auditors Test No:6 Normative and comparative intelligibility functions J Am Audiol Soc 1975:1:221-228.