Central auditory assessment: Thirty years of challenge and change

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1987, Pages 22s-35s

  Musiek, Frank E ^a   Baran, Jane A ^a,b  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEARING TEST; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REVIEW;

AUDITORY DISEASES, CENTRAL; HEARING TESTS; HUMAN;

EID: 0023392202     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Bocca E, Calearo C, Cassinari V. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol. 1954;44:219-21.
2. Bocca E, Calearo C, Cassinari V, Migliavacca F. Testing "cortical" hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol. 1955;42:289-304.
3. Goldstein R, Goodman AC, King RB. Hearing and speech in infantile hemiplegia before and after left hemispherectomy. Neurology 1956;6:869-75.
4. Goldstein R. Hearing and speech follow-up after left hemispherectomy. J Speech Hear Disord 1961;26: 126-9.
5. Jerger J. Observations on auditory behaviors in lesions of the central auditory pathways. Arch Otolaryngol 1960:71:797-806.
6. Lynn GE Benitez JT Eisenbrey AB Gilroy J Wilner HI. Neuro-audiological correlates in cerebral hemisphere lesions: temporal and parietal lobe tumors. Audiol J Aud Commun 1972; 11: 115-34
7. Lynn GE, Gilroy J. Neuro-audiological abnormalities in patients with temporal lobe tumors. J Neurol Sci 1972;17:167-84.
8. Korsan-Bengsten M. Distorted speech audiometry; a methodological and clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol 1973;(suppl 310): 1-75.
9. Lynn GE, Gilroy J. Evaluation of central auditory dysfunction in patients with neurological disorders. In: Keith RW, ed. Central auditory dysfunction. New York: Grune & Stratton. 1977:177-221.
10. Musiek FE, Wilson DH, Pinheiro ML. Audiological manisfestations in splitbrain patients. J Am Audiol Soc 1979;5:25-9.
11. Calearo C, Antonelli AR. Audiometric findings in brainstem lesions. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;66:305- 19.
12. Licklider JCR, Miller GA. The perception of speech. In: Stevens SS, ed. Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951: 1040-74.
13. Bocca E. Clinical aspects of cortical deafness. Laryngoscope 1958;68:301-9.
14. Calearo C, Antonelli AR. "Cortical" hearing tests and cerebral dominance. Acta Otolaryngol 1963;56: 17-26.
15. Beaslev DS, Maki J. Time-and freauencv-altered swech. In: Lass N. ed. Contemporary issues in experimentaI.phoietics. New-York: Academic Press, 1976:419-58.
16. Calearo C, Lazzaroni A. Speech intelligibility in relation to the speed of the message. Laryngoscope 1957;67:410-9.
17. Quaranta A, Cervellera G. Masking level differences in central nervous system diseases. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103:482-4.
18. Beasley DS, Forman B, Rintelmann WF. Perception of timecompressed CNC monosyllables by normal listeners. J Aud Res 1972;12:71-5.
19. Fairbanks G, Everitt W, Jaeger R. Methods for time or frequency compression- expansion of speech. Trans IRE-PGA AU-2, 1954:7-12.
20. Rintelmann WF, Beasley D, Lynn GE. Timecompressed CNC monosyllables: case findings in central auditory disorders. Paper presented to the Michigan Speech and Hearing Association, Detroit, Michigan, 1974.
21. Kurdziel S, Noffsinger D, Olsen W. Performance by cortical lesion patients on 40% and 60% timecompressed materials. J Am Audiol Soc 1976;2:3-7.
22. Baran JA, Verkest S, GollegJy K, Kibble-Michal K, Rintelmann WF, Musiek FE. Use of timecompressed speech in the assessment of central nervous system disorders. Paper presented to the American Acoutical Society, Nashville, Tennessee, 1985.
23. Sinha SO. The role ofthe temporal lobe in hearing. Thesis, Montreal, Quebec McGill University, 1959.
24. Dayal VS, Tarantino L, Swisher LP. Neuro-otologic studies in multiple sclerosis. Laryngoscope 1966;76: 1798-1809.
25. Morales-Garcia C, Poole JO. Masked speech audiometry in central deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 1972;74:307-16.
26. Noffsinger D, Olsen WO, Carhart R, Hart CW, Sahgal V. Auditory and vestibular aberrations in multiple sclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol 1972;(suppl 303): 1-63.
27. Heilman KM, Hammer LC, Wilder BJ. An audiometric defect in temporallobe dysfunction. Neurology 1973;23:384-6.
28. Olsen WO, Noffsinger D, Kurdziel S. Speech discrimination in noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. Acta Otolaryngol 1975;80:375- 82.
29. Rintelmann WF. Monaural speech tests in the detection of central auditory disorders. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985: 173-200.
30. Bess FH. Clinical assessment of speech recognition. In: Konkle DF. Rintelmann WF, eds. Principles of speech audiometry. Baltimore: Unviersity Park Press, 1983: 127-201.
31. Dirks D, Kamm C, Bower D, Betsworth A. Use of performance-intensity functions for diagnosis. J Speech Hear Disord. 1977;42:147-63.
32. Jerger J, Jerger S. Clinical validity of central auditory tests. Scand Audiol.1975;4;147-63.
33. Jerger J, Jerger S. Diagnostic significance of PB word functions. Arch Otolaryngol 1971;93:573-80.
34. Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psycho1 1961;15:157-65.
35. Rosenzweig M. Representation of the two ears at the auditory cortex. Am J Physiol I95 l;l67: 147-58.
36. Sparks R, Goodglass H, Nichel B lpsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex 1970;6:249- 60.
37. Damasio H, Damasio A. Paradoxic ear extinction in dichotic listening: possible anatomic significance. Neurology 1979;29:644-53.
38. Speaks C, Gray T. Miller J, Rubens A. Central auditory deficits and temporal lobe lesions. J Speech Hear Disord 1975;40:192-205.
39. Sidtis J. Predicting brain organization from dichotic listening performance: cortical and subcortical functional asymmetries contribute to perceptual asymmetries. Brain Lang 1982;17:287-300.
40. Musiek FE. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983;4:79-83.
41. Musiek FE, Wilson DH. SSW and dichotic digit results pre-and postcommissurotomy: a case report. J Speech Hear Disord 1979;44:528-33.
42. Musiek FE, Kibbe K, Baran JA. Neuroaudiological results from split-brain patients. Semin Hear 1984;5:219-29.
43. Musiek FE, Kibbe K. An overview of audiological test results in patients with commissurotomy. In: Reeves AG, ed. Epilepsy and the corpus callosum. New York: Plenum Press, 1985:393-9.
44. Musiek FE, Reeves AG, Baran JA. Release from central auditory competition in the split-brain patient. Neurology 1985;35:983-7.
45. Musiek FE. Assessment of three dichotic speech tests on subjects with intracranial lesions. Ear Hear 1983;4:318-23.
46. Katz J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory system. J Aud Res 1962;2:327-37.
47. Brunt MA. The staggered spondaic word test. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1978:334-56.
48. Katz J, Basil RA, Smith JM. A staggered spondaic word test for detecting central auditory lesions. Ann Otol Rhino1 Laryngol 1963;72:906-17.
49. Katz J, Pack G. New developments in differential diagnosis using the SSW test. In: Sullivan MD, ed. Central auditory processing disorders. Proceedings of a conference at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 1975:34- 107.
50. Berlin CI, Lowe-Bell SS, Jannetta PJ, Kline DG. Central auditory deficits after temporal lobectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1972;96:4- 10.
51. Berlin CI, Cullen JK, Hughes LF, Berlin JL, Lowe-Bell SS, Thompson CL. Dichotic processing of speech acoustic and phonetic variables. In: Sullivan MD, ed. Central auditory processing disorders. Proceedings of a conference at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 1975:36-46.
52. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Dichotic speech tests in the detection of central auditory dysfunction. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment ofcentral auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1985:201-18.
53. Jerger JF, Jerger SW. Auditory findings in brainstem disorders. Arch Otolaryngol 1974;99:342-9.
54. Jerger JF, Jerger SW. Clinical validity of central auditory tests. Scand Audiol 1975;4: 147-63.
55. Willeford J. Assessing central auditory behavior in children: a test battery. In: Keith R, ed. Central auditory dysfunction. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1977;43-73.
56. Lynn GE, Gilroy J. Neurological abnormalities in patients with temporal lobe tumors. J Neurol Sci 1972; 17: 167-84.
57. Musiek FE, Guerkink NA. Auditory brainstem response and central auditory test findings for patients with brainstem lesions: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 1982;92:891-900.
58. Pinheiro ML, Jacobson GP, Boller F. Auditory dysfunction following a gun shot wound of the pons. J Speech Hear Disord 1982;47:296-300.
59. Rintelmann WF, Lynn GE. Speech stimuli for assessment of central auditory disorders. In: Konkle DF, Rintelmann WF, eds. Principles of speech audiometry. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1983:231-84.
60. Sanchez-Loneo LP, Forster FM, Auth TL. A clinical test for sound localization and its Gplications. Neurology 1957;7:655-63.
61. Sanchez-Longo LP, Forster FM. Clinical significance of impairment of soundlocalization. Neurology 1958;8:119-25.
62. Swisher L, Hirsh IJ. Brain damage and.the ordering of two temporally successive stimuli. Neuropsychologia 1972;10: 137-52.
63. Lackner J, Teuber H-L. Alterations in auditory fusion thresholds after cerebral injury in man. Neuropsychologia 1973; 11:409- 15.
64. Efron R, Dennis M, Yund EW. The perception of dichotic chords by hemispherectomized subjects. Brain Lang 1977:4:537-49.
65. Efron R, Crandall PH. Central auditory processing: effects of anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain Lang 1983;19:237-53.
66. Efron R, Crandall PH, Koss D, Divenyi PL, Yund EW. Central auditory processing 111. The "Cocktail Party" effect and anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain Lang 1983;19:254-63.
67. Efron R, Yund EW, Nichols D. Crandall PH. An ear asymmetry for gap detection following anterior temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 1985;23:43-50.
68. Efron R. The central auditory system and issues related to hemispheric specialization. In: Pinheiro ML. Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1985:143-54.
69. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. Afferent cortical connections and architectonics of the superior temporal sulcus and surrounding cortex in the Rhesus monkey. Brain Res 1978;149:1-24.
70. Pinheiro ML, Ptacek PH. Reversals in the perception of noise and tone patterns. J Acoust Soc Am 197l;49: 1778-82.
71. Ptacek PH, Pinheiro ML. Pattern reversal in auditory perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1971:49:493-8.
72. Pinheiro ML. Auditory pattern perception in patients with left and right hemisphere lesions. Ohio J Speech Hear 1976;12:9-20.
73. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML, Wilson DH. Auditory pattern perception in "split brain" patients. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:610-2.
74. Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985:219-38.
75. Hirsh IJ. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J Acoust Soc Am 1948;20:536-44.
76. Lickhder JCR. The influence of interaural phase relationships upon the masking of speech by white noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1948;20 150-9.
77. Olsen WO, Noffsinger D, Carhan R. Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. Audiology 1976:15:287-301.
78. Lynn GE, Gilroy J, Taylor PC, Leiser, RP. Binaural masking-level differences in neurological disorders. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:357-62.
79. Noffsinger D, Martinez C, Schaefer A. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesions. Scand Audio1 1982;(suppl 15):81-93.
80. Matzker J. Two methods for the assessment of central auditory functions in case of brain disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1959;68: 1155-97.
81. Bocca E, Calearo C. Central hearing processes. In: Jerger J. ed. Modern developments in audiology. New York: Academic Press, 1963:3;37-70.
82. Lynn GE, Gilroy J. Effects of brain lesions on the perception of monotic and dichotic speech stimuli. In: Sullivan MD, ed. Central auditory processing disorders. Proceedings of a conference at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 1975:47-83.
83. Tobin H. Binaural interaction tasks. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985: 155-72.
84. Sohmer H, Feinmesser M, Szabo G. Sources of electrocochleographic responses as studied in patients with brain damage. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974;37:663-9.
85. Robinson K, Rudge P. Auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1975;1:1164-6.
86. Starr A, Achor W. Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975;32:761-8.
87. Jewett DL, Williston JS. Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971;94:681-96.
88. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ, Bennett M, Moller MB. lntracranially recorded responses from the human auditory nerve: new insights into the origin of brainstem evoked potentials (BSEPs). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981;52:18-27.
89. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ, Moller MB. Neural generators of brainstem evoked potentials. Results from human intracranial recordings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981:90:591-6.
90. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ. Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg 1983;59:493-9.
91. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ. Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;53:612-20.
92. Rowe MJ 111. The brainstem auditory evoked response in neurological disease: a review. Ear Hear 1981;2:41-51.
93. Chiappa K, Jarrison J, Brooks E, Young R. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in 200 patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1980 7: 135-43.
94. Gollegly KM, Kibbe K, Reeves AG, Musiek FE. Auditory behavioral andelectrophysiological results in multiple sclerosis. Presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Washington, DC. 1985.
95. Moller MB, Moller AR. Auditory brainstem-evoked responses (ABR) indiagnosis ofeighth nerve and brainstem lesions. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1985:43-66.
96. Musiek FE, Gollegly KM. ABR in eighth nerve and low brainstem lesions.In: Jacobson JT. ed. The auditory brainstem response. San Diego: College- Hill Press. 1985: 181-202.
97. Nodar R, Kinney S. The contralateral effects of large tumors on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Laryngoscope 1980;90: 1762-8.
98. Musiek FE, Kibbe K. Auditory brainstem response wave IV-V abnormalities from the ear opposite large cerebellopontine lesions. Am J Otol 1986;7:253- 7.
99. Oh S, Kuba T, Soyer A, Choi I, Bonikowski F, Vitek J. Lateralization of brainstem lesions by brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Neurology 1981:31: 14-8.
100. Chiappa K. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. New York: Raven Press, 1983.
101. Wada S, Starr A. Generation of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) 111. Effects of lesions of the superior olive, lateral lemniscus and inferior colliculus on the ABR in the guinea pig. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983:56:352-66.
102. Geisler C, Frishkopf L, Rosenblith W. Extracranial responses to acoustic clicks in man. Science 1958;128:1210-1.
103. Kraus N, Ozdamar O, Hier D, Stein L. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:275-87.
104. Musiek FE, Geurkink NA, Weider DJ, Donnelly K. Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. Laryngoscope 1984;94: 1545-52.
105. Knight RT, Hillyard SA, Woods DL, Neville HJ. The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditory evoked potential in man. ElectroencephalogrClin Neurophysiol 1980;50: 112-24.
106. Kileny P. Middle latency (MLR) and late vertex auditory evoked responses (LVAER) in central auditory dysfunction. In: Pinheiro ML, Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985:87-102.
107. Jerger J, Weikers NJ, Sharbrough FW, Jerger S. Bilateral lesions of the temporal lobe: a case study. Acta Otolaryngol 1969;(suppl258):1-57.
108. Jerger J, Lovering L, Wertz M. Auditory disorder following bilateral temporal lobe insult. Report of a case. J Speech Hear Disord 1972;37:523-35.
109. Graham J, Greenwood R, Lecky B. Cortical deafness: a case report and review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 1980;48:35-49.
110. Michel F, Peronnet F, Schott B. A case of cortical deafness: clinical and electrophysiological data. Brain Lang 1980;10:367-77.
111. Sparks R, Geschwind N. Dichotic listening in man after section of the neocortical commissures. Cortex 1968;4:3-16.
112. Milner B, Taylor S, Speny R. Lateralized suppression ofdichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 1968;161:184-5.
113. Gazzaniga MS, Risse G, Springer S, Clark E, Wilson DH. Psychological and neurological consequences of partial and complete commissurotomy. Neurology 1975;25:10-5.
114. Springer SP, Gazzaniga MS. Dichotic testing of partial and complete splitbrain patients. Neuropsychologia 1975;13:341-6.
115. Springer SP, Sidtis J, Wilson DH, Gazzaniga MS. Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Neuropsychologia 1978;16:305-12.
116. Baran JA. Musiek FE, Reeves AG. Central auditory function following anterior sectioning of corpus callosum. Ear Hear 1986;359-62.
117. Rubens A, Froehling B, Slater G. Anderson D. Left ear suppression on verbal dichotic tests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1985;18:459-63.
118. Speaks C, Niccum N, Van Tassell D. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensonneural hearing loss. J speech Hear Res 1985;28:16-25.
119. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Effect of peripheral and central auditory lesions on auditory pattern perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;79:548.
120. Shimizu H. Evoked response in VlIIth nerve lesions. Laryngoscope 1968;78:2140-52.
121. Hyde M. Effect of cochlear lesions on the ABR. In: Jacobson J, ed. The auditory brainstem response. San Diego: college Hill Press, 1985: 133-46.
122. Multenberger G, Dawson G, Raica N. Central auditory testing with peripheral hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 1978;104:11-5.
123. Jerger S. Decision matrix and information theory analysis in the evaluation of neuroaudiologic tests. Semin Hear 1983;4: 121-32.
124. Hall JW 111. The acoustic reflex in central auditory dysfunction. In: Pinheiro ML. Musiek FE, eds. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundations and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985: 103-30.
125. Squires KC, Hecox KE. Electrophysiological evaluation of higher level auditory processing. Semin Hear 1983;4:415-33.
126. Hillyard SA, Picton TW, Regan D. Sensation, perception and attention: analysis using ERPs. n: Callaway E, Tueting P, Koslow SH. eds. Eventrelated brain potentials in man. New York: Academic Press, 1978:223-322.
127. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Starr A. Long latency event-related components of the auditory evoked potential in dementia. Brain 1978;101:635-48.
128. Roth W, Pfefferbaum A, Kelly A, Berger P, Kopel B. Auditory event related potentials in schizophrenia and depression. Psychiat Res 1981;4: 199-2 12.
129. Squires KC, Chippendale TJ, Wrege KS, Goodin DS, Stam A. Electrophysiological assessment of mental function in aging and dementia. In: Agtng in the 1980's: psychological issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 1982: 125-34.
130. Leppler JC, Greenberg HJ. The P3 potential and its clinical usefulness in the objective classification of dementia. Cortex 1984;20 427-33.
131. Polich J, Stam A. Evoked potentials in aging. In: Alpert ML. ed. Clinical neurology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984:149-77.
132. Chayasirisobhon S, Brinkman SP, Gerganoff S, Genhon S, Pomara N, Green V. Event-related potential in Alzheimer Disease. Clin Electroenceplogr 1985; 16:48-53.
133. Due FH, Bartels PH, Burchfiel JL. Significance probability mapping; an aid in the topographic analysis of brain electrical activity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981;51:455-62.
134. Grillon C, Buchsbaum MS. Computed EEG topography of response to visual and auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;63:42-53.
135. Risberg J, Lngvar DH. Patterns of activation in the gray matter of the dominant hemisphere during memorizing and reasoning. A study of regional cerebral blood flow changes during psychological testing in a group of neurologically normal patients. Brain 1973;96:737-56.
136. Rkberg J, Maxmilian VA, Prohovnik I. Changes of cortical patterns during habituation to a reasoning test. A study with the 133-xe inhalation techniquefor measurement of cerebral blood flood. Neuropsychologia 1977;15:793-89.
137. lngvar DH, Schwartz MS. Blood flow patterns induced in the dominant hemisphere by speech and reading. Brain 1974 97:273-88.
138. Lawn B, Skinhoj E, Lassen NA. Variations in regional cortical blood flood in the right and left hemisphere during automatic speech. Brain 1978;101:193-210.
139. Maximilian VA, Prohovnik I, Risberg J, Hakansson K. Regional blood flood changes in the left cerebral hemisphere during word pair learning and recall. Brain Lang 1978;6:22-31.
140. Risberg J, Halsey JH, Wills EL, Wilson EM. Hemispheric specialization in normal man studied by bilateral measurements of the regional cerebral blood flow: a study with the 133-xe inhalation technique. Brain 1975;98:511-24.
141. Roland PE, Larsen B. Focal increase of cerebral blood flow during stereognostic testing in man. Arch Neurol 1976;33:551-68.
142. Knopman DS, Rubens AB, Massen AC, Meyer MW, Niccum N. Regional cerebral blood flow patterns during verbal and nonverbal auditory activations. Brain Lang 1980;9:93-112.
143. Maximilian VA. Cortical blood flow asymmetries during monaural verbal stimulation. Brain Lang 1982;15:1-11.
144. Lassen N, Roland P. Localization of cognitive function in cerebral blood flow. In: Kertesz A, ed. Localization in neuropsychology. New York Academic Press, 1983:141-52.