An Improved Pencil-of-Functions Method and Comparisons with Traditional Methods of Pole Extraction

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1987, Pages 435-441

  Mackay, Andrew J ^a   McCowen, Andrew ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SAMPLING;

DATA SEQUENCE; EXTENDED PRONY ALGORITHM; JAIN'S PENCIL-OF-FUNCTIONS METHOD; SINGULARITY EXPANSION METHOD (SEM);

MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0023329157     PISSN: 0018926X     EISSN: 15582221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.1987.1144117     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. [1] B. Drachman and E. Rothwell, “A continuation method for identification of the natural frequencies of an object using a measured response,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-33, pp. 445–450, Apr. 1985.
2. [2] D. M. Goodman and D. G. Dudley, “On the use of output-error models for identifying electromagnetic transients,” Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab., Livermore, CA, Rep. UCRL-93385, Sept. 1985.
3. [3] S. M. Kay and S. L. Marple, “Spectrum analysis—A modern perspective,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1380–1419, Nov. 1981.
4. [4] H. J. Price, “An improved Prony algorithm for exponential analysis,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., San Diego, CA, 1979, pp. 310–313.
5. [5] A. G. Ramm, “Extraction of resonance from transient fields,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-33, no. 2, pp. 223–226, Feb. 1985.
6. [6] V. K. Jain, “Filter analysis by use of pencil of functions: Part I,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-21, pp. 574–579, Sept. 1974.
7. [7] V. K. Jain, T. K. Sarkar, and D. D. Weiner, “Rational modelling by pencil-of-functions method,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-31, no. 3, June 1983.