Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 256, Issue 17, 1986, Pages 2391-2392

  Rennie, Drummond ^a  

^a West Suburban Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0023044293     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1986.03380170107031     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Mackay AL: Scientific Quotations: The Harvest of a Quiet Eye. New York, Crane Russak & Co Inc, 1977.
2. Patterson K, Bailar JC: A review of journal peer review, in Warren KS (ed): Selectivity in Information Systems: Survival of the Fittest New York, Praeger Publishers, 1985, pp 64-82.
3. Bailar JC, Patterson K: Journal peer review: The need for a research agenda. N Engl J Med 1985;312:654-657.
4. Wilson JD: Peer review and publication. J Clin Invest 1978;58:1697-1701.
5. Horrobin DF: Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science. Behav Brain Sci 1982;5:217-218.
6. Norman C: ‘When did we agree that peers would cut the melon?’ Science 1986;233:146.
7. The rights of patients. The Wall Street Journal, March 15, 1985.
8. Lock S: A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. London, The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1985.