|
Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1986, Pages 373-405
|
Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AUTONOMY;
ARTICLE;
COMPETENCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ECONOMICS;
EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY;
FAMILY MEMBERS;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
ILLNESS BEHAVIOR;
INDIVIDUALITY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUSTICE;
LAW;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
LIVING WILL;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MORALITY;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONHOOD;
PRIVACY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
STANDARD;
STANDARDS;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
VALUES;
AUTONOMY;
COMPETENCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY MEMBERS;
JUSTICE;
LAW;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
STANDARDS;
UNITED STATES;
VALUES;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DECISION MAKING;
ECONOMICS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
PRIVACY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0022931922
PISSN: 0004153X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (102)
|
References (0)
|