Canadian Geomagnetic Reference Field 1985

Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 1986, Pages 895-921

  Haines, G V ^a   Newitt, L R ^a  

^a NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0022876574     PISSN: 00221392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.38.895     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ALLDREDGE, L. R., Harmonics required in main field and secular variation models, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 36, 63-72, 1984.
2. BARKER, F. S., D. R. BARRACLOUGH, and S. R. C. MALIN, World magnetic charts for 1980-spherical harmonic models of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 65, 525-533, 1981.
3. BARRACLOUGH, D. R., J. M. HARWOOD, B. R. LEATON, and S. R. C. MALIN, A model of the geomagnetic field at epoch 1975, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 43, 645-659, 1975.
4. BENTON, E. R., Geomagnetism of earth's core, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 21, 627-633, 1983.
5. BHATTACHARYYA, B. K., Reduction and treatment of magnetic anomalies of crustal origin in satellite data J. Geophys. Res., 82, 3379-3390, 1977.
6. BURROWS, A. L., The geomagnetic field in New Zealand at epoch 1960.5, Geophys. Mem., Vol. 6, 22 p., 7 plates, N. Z. Dep. of Sci. and Ind. Res., Wellington, 1967.
7. CAIN, J. C., W. E. DANIELS, S. J. HENDRICKS, and D. C. JENSEN, An evaluation of the main geomagnetic field, 1940-1962, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 3647-3674, 1965.
8. CAIN, J. C., S. J. HENDRICKS, R. A. LANGEL, and W. V. HUDSON, A proposed model for the International Geomagnetic Reference Field 1965, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 19, 335-355, 1967.
9. CAIN, J. C. and R. A. LANGEL, Geomagnetic survey by the polar-orbiting geophysical observatories, in World Magnetic Survey 1957-1969, edited by A. J. Zmuda, IAGA Bull., Vol. 28, pp. 65-75, 1971.
10. CHAPMAN, S., Notes on isomagnetic charts: I-Their singular points and contour-lines, Terr. Mag. Atmos. Electr., 45, 433-442, 1940.
11. CHAPMAN, S., Notes on isomagnetic charts: IV-Geomagnetic dip-poles, their nature and that of the isomagnetic lines in their neighborhood, Terr. Mag. Atmos. Elects., 46, 15-26, 1941.
12. CHAPMAN, S., Notes on isomagnetic charts: VII-Mathematical notes on isoporic charts and their singular points, Terr. Mag. Atmos,. Electr., 47, 115-138, 1942.
13. COLES, R. L., Magsat scalar magnetic anomalies at northern high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2576-2582, 1985.
14. COLES, R. L., G. V. HAINES, G. JANSEN VAN REEK, A. NANDI, and J. K. WALKER, Magnetic anomaly maps from 40°N to 83°N derived from Magsat satellite data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 281-284, 1982.
15. DAVIS, T. N., J. D. STOLARIK, and J. P. HEPPNER, Rocket measurements of Sq currents at midlatitude, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 5883-5894, 1965.
16. DAWSON, E. and L. C. DALGETTY, Magnetic charts of Canada for epoch 1965.0, Pub. Dom. Obs., 31, 377-405, Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1966.
17. DAWSON, E. and L. R. NEWITT, An analytical representation of the geomagnetic field in Canada for 1975. Part I: The main field, Can. J. Earth Sci., 14, 477-487, 1977.
18. DAWSON, E. and L. R. NEWITT, An analytical representation of the geomagnetic field in Canada for 1975. Part II: The secular change, Can. J. Earth Sci., 15, 237-244, 1978.
19. DRAPER, N. R. and H. SMITH, Applied Regression Analysis, 407 pp., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966.
20. EARTH PHYSICS BRANCH, Gravity Map of Canada, Lambert conformal conic projection south of 80°N with standard parallels 49°N and 77°N, modified polyconic projection north of 80°N, scale 1: 5,000,000, Map GMS 80-1, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1980.
21. EARTH PHYSICS BRANCH, Magnetic charts of eanada, Lambert conformal conical projection, standard parallels 49°N and 77°N, scale 1: 10,000,000, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1985. (i) Magnetic declinationchart 1985.0: Map MCR 701. (ii) Total intensity chart 1985.0: Map MCR 702. (iii) Horizontal intensity chart 1985.0: Map MCR 703. (iv) Magnetic inclination chart 1985.0: Map MCR 704. (v) Vertical intensity chart 1985.0: Map MCR 705.
22. EFROYMSON, M. A., Multiple regression analysis, in Mathematical Methodsfor Digital Computers, edited by Anthony Ralston and Herbert S. Wilf, Chap. 17, pp. 191-203, John Wiley, New York, 1960.
23. FABIANO, E. B., W.J., JONES, N.W., PEDDIE, The magnetic charts of the United States forepoch 1975, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ., 810, 15 pp., 1979.
24. FUJITA, N., G. S. I. airborne magnetometer and geomagnetic studies on aeromagnetic survey, Bull. Geogr. Surv. Inst., 13, Part 1, 69 pp., 1968.
25. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA, Geological Map of Canada, Lambert conformal conic projectionsouth of 80°N with standard parallels 49°N and 77°N, modified polyconic projection north of 80°N, scale 1: 5,000,000, Map 1250A, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1969a.
26. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA, Tectonic Map of Canada, Lambert conformal conic projection south of 80°N with standard parallels 49°N and 77°N, modified polyconic projection north of 80°N, scale 1: 5,000,000, Map 1251A, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1969b.
27. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA, Magnetic Anomaly Map of Canada, Lambert conformal conic projectionsouth of 80°N with standard parallels 49°N and 77°N, modified polyconic projection north of 80°N, scale 1: 5,000,000, Map 1255A, 4th edition, Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, 1984.
28. HAINES, G. V., The modified polyconic projection, Cartographica, 18, 49-58, 1981.
29. HAINES, G. V., E. P. B. aeromagnetic data (1953-1976), in Proc. Aeromagnetic Data Workshop November 16-18, 1982, Boulder, Colorado, Workshop Proceedings 1, pp. 5-19, National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, 1983.
30. HAINES, G. V., Spherical cap harmonic analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2583-2591, 1985a.
31. HAINES, G. V., Magsat vertical field anomalies above 40°N from spherical cap harmonic analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2593-2598, 1985b.
32. HAINES, G. V., Spherical cap harmonic analysis ofgeomagnetic secular variation over Canada 1960-1983, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12563-12574, 1985c.
33. HAINES, G. V., and W. HANNAFORD, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of the Canadian Arctic, Pub. Earth Phys. Br., 44, 209-234, Ottawa, 1974.
34. HAINES, G. V. and W. HANNAFORD, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of Saskatchewan, Alberta, Yukon and the District of MacKenzie, Geomag. Ser., 8, 34 p., Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1976.
35. HAINES, G. V., and W. HANNAFORD, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of Central Canada, Geomag. Ser., 13, 28 p., Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1978.
36. HAINES, G. V. and W. HANNAFORD, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of eastern Canada/Leve aeromagnetique a trois composantes de Pest du Canada, Geomag. Ser., 16, 24 p. 23 p., Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1980.
37. HANNAFORD, W. and G. V. HAINES, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of the Nordic countries and the Greenland Sea, Pub. Dom Obs., 37, 113-164, Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1969.
38. HANNAFORD, W. and G. V. HAINES, A three-component aeromagnetic survey of British Columbia and the adjacent Pacific Ocean, Pub. Earth Phys. Br., 44, 323-379, Ottawa, 1974.
39. IAGA Division l WORKING GROUP 1, International Geomagnetic Reference Fields: D GRF 1965, D GRF 1970, DEGF 1975, and IGRF 1980, EOS Trans. A. G. U., 62, 1169, 1981.
40. INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION, Proc. 12th General Assembly, 12B, pp. 594-595, 1966.
41. LANGEL, R., J. BERBERT, T. JENNINGS, and R. HORNER, Magsat data processing:a report for investigators, NASA Technical Memorandum, 82160, 315 p., Goddard Space Flight Center, Maryland, 1981.
42. LANGEL, R. A., R. H. ESTES, and G. D. MEAD, Some new methods in geomagnetic field modeling applied to the 1960-1980 epoch, J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 3, 4, 327-349, 1982a.
43. LANGEL, R., G. OUSLEY, J. BERBERT, J. MURPHY, and M. SETTLE, The Magsat mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 243-245, 1982b.
44. LOWES, F. J., Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 36, 717-730, 1974.
45. MAYHEW, M. A., Inversion of satellite magnetic anomaly data, J. Geophys., 45, 119-128, 1979.
46. MAYHEW, M. A., An equivalent layer magnetization model for the United States derived from satellite altitudem agnetic anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 8 7, 4837-4845, 1982.
47. MAYHEW, M. A. and S. C. GALLIHER, An equivalent layer magnetization model for the United States derived from Magsat data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 311-313, 1982.
48. MAYHEW, M. A., B. D. JOHNSON, and R. A. LANGEL, An equivalent source model of the satellite-altitude magnetic anomaly field over Australia, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 5 1, 189-198, 1980.
49. MCLEOD, M. G., Optimal processing of satellite-derived magnetic anomaly data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 3, 1, 10-26, 1983.
50. MCLEOD, M. G. and P. J. COLEMAN Jr., Spatial power spectra of the crustal geomagnetic field and core geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2, 3, P5-P19, 1980.
51. MUELLER, I. I. and J. D. ROCKIE, Gravimetric and Celestial Geodesy: A Glossary of Terms, 129 pp., Frderick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1966.
52. NEWITT, L. R. and G. V. HAINES, An interactive magnetic information retrieval program, Internal Report, 1985-4 (G), 15 pp., Division of Seismology and Geomagnetism, Earth Phys. Br., Ottawa, 1985.
53. OSTROWSKI, J. A., Spectra of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field and its secular variation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 3, 4, 417-422, 1982.
54. PEDDLE, N. W., International Geomagnetic Reference Field:the third generation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 34, 309-326, 1982.
55. PEDDLE, N. W. and E. B. FABIANO, A proposed lnternational Geomagnetic Reference Field for 1965-1985, J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 3, 4, 357-364, 1982.
56. PEDDLE, N. W. and A. K. ZUNDE, An assessment of the near-surface accuracy of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field 1980 model of the main geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 37, 1-4, 1985.
57. REILLY, W. I. and A. L. BURROWS, The geomagnetic field in New Zealand at epoch 1970.5, Geophys. Mem., 8, 43 pp., 7 plates, N. Z. Dep. of Sci. and Ind. Res., Wellington, 1973.
58. SAILOR, R. V., A. R. LAZAREWICZ, and R. F. BRAMMER, Spatial resolutioan nd repeatabilitoyf Magsat crustala nomaly data over the Indian Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 289-292, 1982.
59. SHOJI, D., Magnetic Survey of Japan 1974-1975, Data Report of Hydrographic Observations, Series of Magnetic Survey, 3, 171 pp., 8 plates, Maritime Safety Agency, Tokyo, 1978.
60. SUCKSDORFF, C. and H. NEVANLINNA, Magnetic charts of Finland for 1980.0, Studies on Earth Magnetism, 27, 22 pp., 7 plates, Finn. Meteorol. Inst., Helsinki, 1981.
61. TSUBOKAWA, I., Reduction of the results obtained by the magnetic survey of Japan (1948-51) to the epoch 1950.0 and deduction of the empirical formulae expressing the magnetic elements, Bull. Geogr. Surv. Inst., 3, 1-29, 3 plates, 1952.
62. VESTINE, E. H., Report of committee on magnetic charts-methodology, in Transactions of Oslo Meeting, IATME Bull., Vol. 13, pp. 316-317, Washington, 1950.