|
Volumn 53, Issue 4, 1986, Pages 1274-1342
|
The constitutionality of regulating human genetic engineering: where procreative liberty and equal opportunity collide.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
RECOMBINANT DNA;
ACKERMAN, BRUCE;
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CLONING;
CONTRACEPTION;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
GENE THERAPY;
GENETIC DISORDER;
GENETIC ENGINEERING;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MEDICAL GENETICS;
PARENT;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHILOSOPHY;
POLICY;
REPRODUCTION;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
UNITED STATES;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
ACKERMAN, BRUCE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CLONING, ORGANISM;
CONTRACEPTION;
DNA, RECOMBINANT;
EUGENICS;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
GENE THERAPY;
GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN;
GENETIC ENGINEERING;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PARENTS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHILOSOPHY;
PREJUDICE;
PUBLIC POLICY;
REPRODUCTION;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
UNITED STATES;
WRONGFUL LIFE;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0022781540
PISSN: 00419494
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/1599749 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (0)
|