Linking downtown development to broader community goals: An analysis of linkage policy in three cities

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 1986, Pages 133-141

  Keating, W Dennis ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOSTON; DOWNTOWN PLANNING; SAN FRANCISCO; SANTA MONICA;

EID: 0022514729     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944368608976613     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Achtenberg, Emily. 1984. Preserving affordable rental housing in Boston: An analysis of recent market trends and regulatory policies. Boston: Boston Rent Equity Board.
2. Adams, Gerald. 1984. A last-ditch effort to save downtown San Francisco. Planning 47, 9 (February): 4-11.
3. Advisory Committee on Linked Development. 1985. Draft report. Chicago: City of Chicago.
4. Advisory Group on Linkage Between Downtown Development and Neighborhood Housing. 1983. Linkage between downtown development and neighborhood housing: Report to the mayor. Boston: City of Boston.
5. Boston Redevelopment Authority. 1984. Downtown projects: Opportunities for Boston. Boston: City of Boston.
6. Diamond, Susan. 1983. The San Francisco office/housing program: Social policy underwritten by private enterprise. Harvard Environmental Law Review 7: 449-486.
7. Diamond, Susan. and Laurie Share. 1983. San Francisco’s office-housing production program. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest 35, 10 (October): 4-10.
8. Eliickson, Robert C. 1985. Indusionary housing programs: Yet another misguided urban policy? In Inclusionary Zoning Moves Downtown, edited by Dwight Merriam, David J. Brower, and Philip D. Tegeler. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
9. Environmental Science Associates. 1983. Growth management alternatives for downtown San Francisco. San Francisco: Environmental Science Associates.
10. Ferman, Barbara. 1985. Governing the ungovernable city: Political skill, leadership, and the modern mayor. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11. Fulton, William. 1985. On the beach with the progressives. Planning 51, 1 (January): 4-9.
12. Griffin, John. 1985. Inclusionary zoning and linkage in Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts. In Downtown Linkages, edited by Douglas Porter. Washington: Urban Land Institute.
13. Gruen, Nina. 1985. A case history of the San Francisco office/housing linkage program. In Downtown Linkages, edited by Douglas Porter. Washington: Urban Land Institute.
14. Hannon and Associates. 1984. Miami’s downtown component of Met-rorail: Public-private coventure financing using a special assessment district. Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation.
15. Hartman, Chester. 1984. The transformation of San Francisco. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and AHanheld.
16. Jacobs, Allan. 1978. Making city planning work. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
17. Kayden, Jerome S. 1978. Incentive zoning in New York City: A cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
18. Keating, W. Dennis. 1985. Downtown linkage policies: A case study of developers' opinions on San Francisco’s program. In Downtown Linkages, edited by Douglas Porter. Washington: Urban Land Institute.
19. Lowenstein, Louis K. 1972. High rise hassle: How the "ups" beat the "downs" in San Francisco. Real Estate Review 2, 1 (Spring): 24-29.
20. Lowenstein, Louis K. 1976. San Francisco’s high rise hassle revisited. Real Estate Review 6, 1 (Spring): 105-111.
21. Lowenstein, Louis K. 1980. An ongoing downtown office building controversy. Real Estate Review 10, 3 (Fall): 94-100.
22. Mallach, Alan. 1984. lnclusionary housing programs: Policies and practices. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
23. Masotti, Louis H., and Mary K. Ludgin. 1985. Downtown development: Chicago 1979-1984. Evanston, 111.: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.
24. Mollenkopf, John H. 1983. The contested city. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
25. Palmer, John, and Isabel Sawhill, eds. 1982. The Reagan experiment: An examination of economic and social policies under the Reagan administration. Washington: Urban Institute Press.
26. Ponte, Robert. 1982. New York’s zoning solution. Planning 48, 12 (December): 10-14.
27. Porter, Douglas R. 1985. The office/housing linkage issue. Urban Land 44, 9 (September): 16-21.
28. Recht, Hausrath & Associates. 1984. The economic basis for an office-housing production program. San Francisco: San Francisco Department of City Planning.
29. Ruth, Herman D. 1970. Economic aspects of the San Francisco zoning ordinance bonus system. In The New Zoning: Legal, Administrative, and Economic Concepts and Techniques, edited by Norman Marcus and Marilyn W. Groves. New York: Praeger Publishers.
30. San Francisco City and County. 1985. Downtown plan (Ordinance 414-85).
31. Schwartz, Seymour I., and Robert A. Johnston. 1983. Inclusionary housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association 49, 1 (Winter): 3-21.
32. Sedway, Paul H. 1985. The San Francisco downtown plan: Office boom brings housing boon. In lnclusionary Zoning Moves Downtown, edited by Dwight Merriam, David J. Brower, and Philip D. Tegeler. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
33. Shearer, Derek. 1982. How the progressives won in Santa Monica. Social Policy 12, 3 (Winter): 7-14.
34. Shiffman, Ron. 1985. A housing trust fund for New York City: One proposal. In Inclusionary Zoning Moves Downtown, edited by Dwight Merriam, David J. Brower, and Philip D. Tegeler. Chicago: APA Planners Press.