Recommended standards for visual system evoked potentials

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 3, Issue , 1986, Pages 54-70

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FLASH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; METHODOLOGY; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PATTERN STIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0022475058     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: 15371603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-198610001-00014     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arden GB, Bodis-Wollner I, Halliday AM, Jeffrey A, Kulikowski JJ, Spekreijse H, Regan D. Methodology of pattern visual stimulation. In: Desmedí JE, ed. Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977:3–15.
2. Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM, Kriss A. The effect of experimental “scotomata” on the ipsilateral and contralateral response to pattern-reversal in one half-field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:376–92.
3. Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Kriss A, Halliday AM. The pattern-evoked potential in lesions of the posterior visual pathways. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982;133:264–89.
4. Bodis-Wollner I, Hendley CD, Mylin LH, Thornton J. Visual evoked potentials and the visuogram in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1979;5:40–7.
5. Bodis-Wollner I, Onofrj M. System diseases and visual evoked potential diagnosis in neurology: changes due to synaptic malfunction. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982;388:327–47.
6. Celesia G. Steady-state and transient visual evoked potentials in clinical practice. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982;388:290–305.
7. Celesia GG, Daly RF. Visual electroencephalographic computer analysis (VEC A). Neurology (NY) 1977;27:637–41.
8. Chatrian GE, Lettich E, Nelson PL, Miller RC, McKenzie RJ, Mills RP. Computer assisted quantitative electroretinography I: a standardized method. Am J EEG Technol 1980;20:57–77.
9. Chatrian GE, Nelson PL, Lettich E, Miller RC, McKenzie RJ, Mills RP. Computer assisted quantitative electroretinography II: separation of rod and cone components of the electroretinogram in congenital achromatopsia and congenital nyctalopia. Am J EEG Technol 1980;20:79–88.
10. Haimovic IC, Pedley TA. Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. II. Lesions of the chiasm and posterior visual pathways. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:121–31.
11. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked responses in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972;1:982–5.
12. Kooi KA. Visual evoked potentials in central disorders of the visual system. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row, 1979.
13. Lawwill T, Burian HM. A modification of the Burian-Allen contact lens electrode for human electroretinography. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;61:1506–9.
14. Noonan BD, Wilkus RJ, Chatrian GE, Lettich E. The influence of direction of gaze on the human electroretinogram recorded from periorbital electrodes: a study utilizing a summating technique. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973;35:495–502.
15. Norden LC, Leach NE. Calibration of the ERG stimulus. In: Lawwill T, ed. ERG, VER and psycho-physics, XIV ISCERG symposium. The Hague: W. Junk, 1977:52–9. (Documenta Ophthalmolo-gica Proceedings Series, vol 13).
16. Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966;20:238–48.