The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods

Pain

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1986, Pages 117-126

  Jensen, Mark P ^a   Karoly, Paul ^a   Braver, Sanford ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGESIMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0022467080     PISSN: 03043959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cancer-related pain. II. Assessment with visual analogue scales
2. EMG biofeedback and tension headache: a controlled outcome study
3. A protocol for the medico-psychosocial evaluation of patients with chronic pain
4. Pain measurement: an overview
5. Suppose We Measured Height With Rating Scales Instead of Rulers
6. Studies with pain rating scales
7. Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors
8. Analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS): a new method for pain assessment
9. A standardized evaluation of psychosocial factors in chronic pain
10. Measurement of pain
11. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain
12. The assessment of pain: concepts and procedures
13. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement
14. A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance
15. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods
16. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale
17. Graphic representation of pain
18. The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
19. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain
20. Conceptual issues in the assessment of clinical pain