|
Volumn 99, Issue 1, 1985, Pages 330-343
|
The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HARRIS V. MCRAE;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LABOR;
LEGAL APPROACH;
POVERTY;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
ROE V. WADE;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HARRIS V. MCRAE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ROE V. WADE;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LABOR, OBSTETRIC;
POVERTY;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0022147089
PISSN: 0017811X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/1341122 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (29)
|
References (0)
|