The mutability of time and space on the skin

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 1985, Pages 233-237

  Geldard, Frank A ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPIMETRIC TECHNIQUE; CUTANEOUS SENSATION; SENSORY SALTATION; TACTILE DISPLAYS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SALTATORY CONDUCTION; SKIN; SKIN SENSATION;

ANIMAL; AOTUS TRIVIRGATUS; ARM; HUMAN; SKIN; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH;

EID: 0021924534     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: NA     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.392264     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Abbe, M. (1936). “The spatial effect upon the perception of time,” Jpn. J. Exp. Psychol. 3, 1–52.
2. Abe, S. (1935). “Experimental study on the correlation between time and space,” Tohoku Pyschol. Folia 3, 53–68.
3. Benussi, V. (1917). “Versuche zur Analyse taktil erweckter Scheinbewegun-gen,” Arch. Gesamte Psychol. 36, 58–135.
4. Gelb, A. (1914). “Versuche auf dem Gebiete der Zeit-und Raumans-chauung,” in Berichte über die VI Kongress fur experimentelle Psycholo-gie in Gottingen, edited by F. Schumann (Barth, Leipzig), pp. 36–42.
5. Geldard, F. A., and Sherrick, C. E. (1972). “The cutaneous ‘rabbit’: A perceptual illusion,” Science 178, 178–179.
6. Helson, H. (1930). “The tau effect—An example of psychological relativity,” Science 71, 736–737.
7. Helson, H., and King, S. M. (1931). “The tau effect: An example of psychological relativity,” J. Exp. Psychol. 14,202-217.
8. Kirman, J. H. (1974). “Tactile apparent movement: The effects of intersti-mulus onset interval and stimulus duration,” Percept. Psychophys. 15, 1–6.
9. Lechelt, E. C., and Borchert, R. (1977). “The interdependence of time and space in somesthesis: The tau effect reexamined,” Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 10,191-193.
10. Sherrick, C. E., and Rogers, R. (1966). “Apparent haptic movement,” Percept. Psychophys. 1, 175–180.
11. Sur, M., Merzenich, M. M., and Kaas, J. H. (1980). “Magnification, receptive field area, and ‘hypercolumn’ size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys,” J. Neurophysiol. 44, 295–311.