Competition within stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta

Annals of Botany

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1984, Pages 349-362

  Cannell, M G R ^a   Rothery, P ^a   Ford, E D ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition; Growth model; Monoculture; Picea sitchensis; Pinus contorta; Relative growth rate; Self thinning

Indexed keywords

PICEA SITCHENSIS; PINUS CONTORTA;

EID: 0021541565     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086699     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aitken, D. P. and Watkjnson, A. R., 1980. A model for growth and self-thinning in even-aged monocultures of plants. Annals of Botany 45, 419-27.
2. Bella, I. E., 1971. A new competition model for individual trees. Forest Science 17, 364-72.
3. Britton, N. F., 1982. A model for suppression and dominance in trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 97, 691-8.
4. Cannell, M. G. R., Njuguna, C. K., Ford, E. D. and Smith, R. (Appendix H. M. Ross Parker), 1977. Variation in yield among competing individuals within mixed genotype stands of tea: a selection problem. Journal of Applied Ecology 14, 969-85.
5. Cuff, A. D. and Ord, J. K., 1973. Spatial Autocorrelations, 178 pp. Pion Ltd, London.
6. Diogle, P. J., 1976. A spatial stochastic model of inter-plant competition. Journal of Applied Probability 13, 662-71.
7. Ford, E. D., 1975. Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. Journal of Ecology 63, 311-33.
8. Aitken, D.P. 1979. An ecological basis for predicting the growth and stability of plantation forests, pp. 147-174. In The Ecology of Even-aged Forest Plantations, eds E. D. Ford, D. C. Malcolm and J. Atterson, 582 pp. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 68 Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
9. Aitken, D.P.and Diogle, P.J., 1981. Competition for light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic process. Annals of Botany 48, 481-500.
10. Aitken, D.P.and Newbould, P.J., 1970. Stand structure and dry weight production through the sweet chestnut (Caslanea saliva Mill.) coppice cycle. Journal of Ecology 58, 275-296.
11. Gates, D. J., 1978. Bimodality in even-aged plant monocultures. Journal of Theoretical Biology 71, 525-40.
12. Harper, J. L., 1977. Population Biology of Plants, 892 pp. Academic Press, London.
13. Hegyi, F., 1974. A simulation model for managing Jack pine stands, pp. 74-90. In Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation, ed. J. Fries. Research Notes 30, Department of Forest Yield Research, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm.
14. Krishna-Iyer, P. V., 1949. The first and second moments of some probability distributions arising from points on a lattice and their application. Biometrika 36, 135-41.
15. Aitken, D. P.1950. The theory of probability distributions of points on a lattice. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21, 198-217.
16. Laessle, A. M., 1965. Spacing and competition in natural stands of sand pine. Ecology 46, 65-72.
17. Mohler, C. L., Marks, P. L. and Sprugel, D. G., 1978. Stand structure and allometry of trees during selfthinning of pure stands. Journal of Ecology 66, 599-614.
18. Moran, P. A. P., 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 10, 243-51.
19. Aitken, D. P.1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17-23.
20. Westoby, M., 1982. Frequency distributions of plant size during competitive growth of stands: the operation of distribution-modifying functions. Annals of Botany 50, 733-5.