|
|
Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1984, Pages 23-25
|
|
The case of Mary Hier: when substituted judgment becomes sleight of hand.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CASE REPORT;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
DEMENTIA;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
ENTERIC FEEDING;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
IN RE HIER;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
IN RE HIER;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
AGED;
DECISION MAKING;
DEMENTIA;
ENTERAL NUTRITION;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MASSACHUSETTS;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
NEW YORK;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0021472162
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3561162 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (13)
|
|
References (0)
|
