SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 1984, Pages 952-957

Integrated dc SQUID magnetometer with a high slew rate

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETOMETERS;

EID: 0021444925 PISSN: 00346748 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1063/1.1137871 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (120)

References (19)

2
- 0009325816
- For a review see, for example edited by B. B. Schwartz and S. FonerPlenum, New York
- (1977) Superconductor Applications: SQUIDs and Machines , pp. 67
- Clarke, J.¹

6
- 0020124824
- (1983) IEEE Trans. Magn , vol.MAG-19 , pp. 446
- Martinis, J.M.¹ Clarke, J.²

7
- 36749120717
- (1983) Appl. Phys. Lett , vol.43 , pp. 694
- Hilbert, C.¹ Clarke, J.²

9
- 84951363853
- A dc SQUID with a two-pole integrator is commercially available from S. H. E. Corporation. Giffard (Ref. 9) has described a SQUID with a two-pole integrator in the feedback loop

10
- 0040624693
- edited by H. D. Hahlbohm and H. LubbigWalter de Gruyter, Berlin
- (1980) Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices and their Applications , pp. 445
- Giffard, R.P.¹

11
- 0009250622
- (1981) Appl. Phys. Lett , vol.38 , pp. 723
- Cromar, M.W.¹ Carelli, P.²

12
- 0020208360
- (1982) J. Appl. Phys , vol.53 , pp. 7592
- Carelli, P.¹ Foglietti, V.²

13
- 0020127233
- (1983) IEEE Trans. Magn , vol.MAG-19 , pp. 299
- Carelli, P.¹ Foglietti, V.²

18
- 84951363852
- We have made two approximations. First, strictly speaking, one should use the value of S(f) appropriate for the SQUID in the presence of the input circuit. However, measurements on similar SQUIDs have indicated that the error resulting from the use of the values for the bare SQUID is small. Second, one should include a term for the current noise in the SQUID, which produces an additional noise contribution (see Ref. 15). However, because the inductance of the input coil is below the value for optimum sensitivity, this contribution is relatively small, and we shall neglect it.

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.