Three viewpoints on the therapeutic alliance: Similarities, differences, and associations with psychotherapy outcome

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Volumn 172, Issue 7, 1984, Pages 417-423

  Marziali, E ^a,b  

^a CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; THERAPY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0021280974     PISSN: 00223018     EISSN: 1539736X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198407000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change. Psychol. Monogr. 42: Whole No., 1962.
2. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 4: 561-571, 1961.
3. Bednar, R. L. Therapeutic relationship of A-B therapists as perceived by client and therapist. J. Counsel. Psychol., 17: 119-122,1970.
4. Cronbach, I. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., et al. The Dependability of Behavioural Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972.
5. Derogatis, L. R. BSI Administration and Procedures: Manual-I. Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, Maryland, 1983.
6. Gomes-Schwartz B. Effective ingredients in psychotherapy: Prediction of outcome from process variables. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 46:1023-1035, 1978.
7. Gurman, A. S., and Razin, A. M. Effective Psychotherapy: A Handbook of Research, pp. 503-543. Pergamon Press, New York, 1977.
8. Kaltreider, N. B., DeWitt, K. N., Weiss, D. S., and Horowitz, M. J. Patterns of Individual Change Scales. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 38: 1263-1269,1981.
9. Luborsky, L. Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The ground work for a study of their relationship to outcome. In Cleghorn, J., Ed., Successful Psychotherapy. Brunner/Mazel, New York, 1976.
10. Luborsky, L. Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcome of psychotherapy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 171: 480-491, 1983.
11. Malan, D. H. Toward the Validation of Dynamic Psychotherapy. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1976.
12. Marziali, E., Marmar, C., and Krupnick, J. Therapeutic alliance scales: Development and relationship to psychotherapy out-come. Am. J. Psychiatry, 138: 361-364,1981.
13. Moras, K., and Strupp, H. H. Pretherapy interpersonal relations patients’ alliance and outcome in brief therapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 39: 405-409,1982.
14. Morgan, R., Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. Predicting the outcomes of psychotherapy by the Penn helping alliance rating method. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 39:397-402,1982.
15. Nie, N. H. SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
16. Orlinsky, D., and Howard, K. Varieties of Psychotherapeutic Experience. Teachers College Press, New York, 1975.
17. Saltzman, C., Luetgert, M. J., Roth, C. H., et al. Formation of a therapeutic relationship: Experiences during the initial phase of psychotherapy as predictors of treatment duration and outcome. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 44: 546-555,1976.
18. Sandel Sachs, J. Negative factors in brief psychotherapy: An empirical assessment. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 51:557-564, 1983.
19. Tinsley, H. E., and Weiss, D. J. Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgements. J. Counsel. Psychol., 22: 358-376,1975.
20. Weissman, M., and Bothwell, S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 33:1111-1115, 1976.