-
1
-
-
0016401041
-
Non-randomized controls in cancer clinical trials
-
Gehan EA, Freireich EJ. Non-randomized controls in cancer clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1974; 290: 198–203.
-
(1974)
N Engl J Med
, vol.290
, pp. 198-203
-
-
Gehan, E.A.1
Freireich, E.J.2
-
2
-
-
0018782393
-
Are randomized trials appropriate for evaluating new operations?
-
Bonchek LI. Are randomized trials appropriate for evaluating new operations? N Engl J Med 1980; 301: 44–5.
-
(1980)
N Engl J Med
, vol.301
, pp. 44-45
-
-
Bonchek, L.I.1
-
3
-
-
0018750520
-
A new design for randomized clinical trials
-
Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 1242–5.
-
(1979)
N Engl J Med
, vol.300
, pp. 1242-1245
-
-
Zelen, M.1
-
4
-
-
0018956685
-
Advantages and drawbacks of the Zelen design for randomized clinical trials
-
Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Advantages and drawbacks of the Zelen design for randomized clinical trials. J Clin Pharmacol 1980; 20: 425–7.
-
(1980)
J Clin Pharmacol
, vol.20
, pp. 425-427
-
-
Horwitz, R.I.1
Feinstein, A.R.2
-
5
-
-
0016291813
-
Allocation of subjects in medical experiments
-
Weinstein MC. Allocation of subjects in medical experiments. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 1278–85.
-
(1974)
N Engl J Med
, vol.291
, pp. 1278-1285
-
-
Weinstein, M.C.1
-
6
-
-
0002288775
-
-
In: Shapiro SH, Louis TA, eds. Clinical trials: issues and approaches. New York: Marcel Dekker,
-
Chalmers TC. The control of bias in clinical trials. In: Shapiro SH, Louis TA, eds. Clinical trials: issues and approaches. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1983:115–27.
-
(1983)
The control of bias in clinical trials.
, pp. 115-127
-
-
Chalmers, T.C.1
-
7
-
-
0019575894
-
The clinical trial
-
Idem. The clinical trial. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1981; 0 59: 324–39.
-
(1981)
Milbank Mem Fund Q
, vol.59
, pp. 324-339
-
-
-
8
-
-
0020045659
-
Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials
-
Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72: 233–40.
-
(1982)
Am J Med
, vol.72
, pp. 233-240
-
-
Sacks, H.1
Chalmers, T.C.2
Smith, H.3
-
9
-
-
0020679235
-
Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials: randomized v historical controls
-
Sacks. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials: randomized v historical controls. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143: 753–5.
-
(1983)
Arch Intern Med
, vol.143
, pp. 753-755
-
-
Sacks1
-
10
-
-
0018267981
-
A show of confidence
-
Rothman KJ. A show of confidence. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 1362–3.
-
(1978)
N Engl J Med
, vol.299
, pp. 1362-1363
-
-
Rothman, K.J.1
-
11
-
-
0018076475
-
The importance of beta, the Type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial: survey of 71 “negative” trials
-
Freiman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Kuebler RR. The importance of beta, the Type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial: survey of 71 “negative” trials. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 690–4.
-
(1978)
N Engl J Med
, vol.299
, pp. 690-694
-
-
Freiman, J.A.1
Chalmers, T.C.2
Smith, H.3
Kuebler, R.R.4
-
12
-
-
0020596472
-
Association of adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic-ulcer disease
-
Messer J, Reitman D, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr, Chalmers TC. Association of adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic-ulcer disease. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 21–4.
-
(1983)
N Engl J Med
, vol.309
, pp. 21-24
-
-
Messer, J.1
Reitman, D.2
Sacks, H.S.3
Smith, H.4
Chalmers, T.C.5
|