Some Improvements in the Measurement of Variable Latency Acoustically Evoked Potentials in Human EEG

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn BME-30, Issue 5, 1983, Pages 295-303

  Steeger, Gerhard H ^a,b   Herrmann, Otto ^c   Spreng, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AVERAGING; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FILTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

ACOUSTIC WAVES - MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS - ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;

ACOUSTICALLY EVOKED POTENTIALS; LATENCY; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD DETECTORS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 0020972036     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1983.325119     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. G. D. Dawson, “Cerebral responses to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve in man,” J. Neurol Neurosurg. Psych., vol. 10, pp. 134–140,1947.
2. —, “A summation technique for detecting small evoked potentials,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 6, pp. 65–84, 1954.
3. D. Regan, Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology, and Clinical Medicine. London, England: Chapman & Hall, 1972.
4. W. D. Keidel and M. Spreng, “Computed audio-encephalograms in man (A technique of ‘objective’ audiometry),” Int. Audiol., vol. 4, pp. 56–60, 1965.
5. H. Davis, “Electric response audiometry, with special reference to the vertex potentials,” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol. V, W. D. Keidel and W. D. Neff, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1976, part 3, pp. 85–103.
6. W. D. Keidel, “The physiological background of the electric response audiometry,” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol. V, W. D. Keidel and W. D. Neff, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1976, part 3, pp. 104–231.
7. B. McA. Sayers and H. A. Beagley, “The mechanism of auditory evoked EEG responses,” Nature, vol. 247, pp. 481–483, 1974.
8. C. D. Woody, “Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals,” Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 5, pp. 539–553, 1967.
9. C. D. Woody and M. J. Nahvi, “Application of optimum linear filter theory to the detection of cortical signals preceding facial movement in cat,” Exp. Brain Res., vol. 16, pp. 455–465, 1973.
10. M. Spreng and W. D. Keidel, “Problems of simple averaging of electro-physiological recordings and the use of additional methods,” Rev. Laryngol., Suppl., pp. 722–738, 1971.
11. E. David, P. Finkenzeller, S. Kallert, and W. D. Keidel, “Korrelationsanalyse von gemittelten und ungemittelten evozierten Potentialen,” Kybernetik, vol. 9, pp. 22–26, 1971.
12. G. Pfurtscheller and R. Cooper, “Selective averaging of the intracerebral click evoked response in man: An improved method of measuring latencies and amplitudes,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 38, pp. 187–190, 1975.
13. D. G. Wastell, “Statistical detection of individual evoked responses: An evaluation of Woody’s adaptive filter,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 42, pp. 835–839, 1977.
14. G. H. Steeger, “Simulation eines adaptiven digitalen Filters mit endlicher Impulsantwort zur Messung akustisch evozierter Potentiale im EEG,” Interdisciplinary Model DORA, Univ. Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, West Germany, Rep. D4-5, 1974 (No. RN 2138 in Techn. Informationsbibliothek, Hannover, West Germany).
15. C. W. Helstrom, Statistical Theory of Signal Detection, 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1968.
16. M. J. Nahvi, C. D. Woody, R. Ungar, and A. R. Sharafat, “Detection of neuroelectric signals from multiple data channels by optimum linear filter method,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 38, pp. 191–198,1975.
17. J. A. McEven and G. B. Anderson, “Modeling the stationarity and Gaussianity of spontaneous electroencephalographic activity,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-22, pp. 361–369, 1975.
18. M. Spreng, “Variability of the early auditory evoked extracranial components,” Scand. Audiol., Suppl. 11, pp. 79–89, 1980.
19. G. Bodenstein and H. M. Praetorius, “Feature extraction from the electroencephalogram by adaptive segmentation,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 65, pp. 642–652, 1977.
20. H. L. van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I. New York: Wiley, 1968.
21. G. H. Steeger, “Ein Beitrag zur Verbesserung der Messung akustisch evozierter Potentiale variabler Latenz im EEG des Menschen” (Ausgewählte Arbeiten über Nachrichtensysteme, no. 37), H. W. Schüssler, Ed., Lehrstuhl für Nachrichtentechnik, Univ. Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, West Germany, 1979 (reprint of Dr.-Ing. dissertation).
22. A. Papoulis, The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
23. L. A. Zadeh and J. R. Ragazzini, “Optimum filters for the detection of signals in noise,” Proc. IRE, vol. 40, pp. 1223–1231,1952.
24. N. Wiener, Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1964.
25. A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
26. D. G. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods. New York: Wiley, 1969.
27. S. Zohar, “The solution of a Toeplitz set of linear equations,” J. Ass. Comput. Mach., vol. 21, pp. 272–276, 1974.
28. C. L. Rino, “The inversion of covariance matrices by finite Fourier transforms,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-16, pp. 230–233, 1970.
29. T. W. Parks and J. H. McClellan, “A program for the design of linear phase finite impulse response digital filters,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust., vol. AU-20, pp. 195–199, 1972.