English population history from family reconstitution: Summary results 1600-1799*

Population Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1983, Pages 157-184

  Wrigley, E A ^a   Schofield, R S ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b CLARE COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM;

DEMOGRAPHY; GREAT BRITAIN; HISTORY OF MEDICINE, ANCIENT; HISTORY OF MEDICINE, EARLY MODERN; HISTORY OF MEDICINE, MEDIEVAL; HISTORY OF MEDICINE, MODERN; STATISTICS;

EID: 0020968090     PISSN: 00324728     EISSN: 14774747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00324728.1983.10408745     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. S. Schofield, ‘Representativeness and family reconstitution’, Annales de demographic historique 1972, pp. 121-125, esp. p. 125
2. E. A. Wrigley (ed.), An Introduction to English Historical Demography (London, 1966) esp. pp. 146-169.
3. E. A. Wrigley, ‘Mortality in pre-industrial England: the example of Colyton, Devon, over three centuries’, in D. V. Glass and R. Revelle (eds), Population and Social Change (London, 1972), pp. 243-273, esp. 247-252.
4. E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield, The Population History of England (London, 1981), chapters 4 and 5, esp. pp. 140-143.
5. T. H. Hollingsworth, Historical Demography (London, 1969), pp. 154-155.
6. E. A. Wrigley, ‘Marriage, fertility and population growth in eighteenth-century England’ in R. B. Outhwaite (ed.), Marriage and Society: Studies in the Social History ofMarriage (London, 1981), pp. 137-185, esp. pp. 155-163 and table 8, p. 181.
7. A. J. Coale and T. J. Trussell, ‘Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations’, Population Index, 40 (1974), pp. 185-258.
8. ‘Technical note: finding the true parameters that specify a model of marital fertility’, Population Index, 44 (1978), pp. 201-213.
9. L. Henry ‘Some data on natural fertility’, Eugenics Quarterly, 8 (1961), pp. 81-91.
10. E. A. Wrigley, ‘Family limitation in pre-industrial England’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 19 (1966), pp. 82-109.
11. R. B. Morrow, ‘Family limitation in pre-industrial England: a reappraisal’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 31 (1978), pp. 419-428.
12. E. A. Wrigley in ‘Marital fertility in seventeenth century Colyton: a note’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 31 (1978), pp. 429-436.
13. A. Imhof, ‘Die namentliche Auswertung der Kirchenbiicher: Die Familien von Giessen 1631-1700 und Heuchelheim 1691-1900', in A.lmhof(ed.), Historische Demographie als Sozialgeschichte, 2 vols. (Darmstadt und Marburg, 1975), vol. I, pp. 279-516
14. R. Andorka, ‘Un example de faible fecondite legitime dans une region de la Hongrie’, Annates de demographie historique (1972), pp. 25-53
15. D. Gaunt, ‘Family planning and the pre-industrial society: some Swedish evidence’, in K. Agren et al., Aristocrats, Farmers, Proletarians (Uppsala, 1973), pp, 28-59.
16. E. A. Wrigley, ‘Births and baptisms: the use of Anglican baptism registers as a source of information about the numbers of births in England before the beginning of civil registration’, Population Studies, 31 (1977), pp. 281-312.
17. J. Knodel and C. Wilson, ‘The secular increase in fecundity in German village populations: an analysis of reproductive histories of couples married 1750-1899', Population Studies, 35, (1981), pp. 53-84, esp. table 2, p. 60.
18. A. Imhof. ‘La rnortalite infantile differentielle en Allemagne du 18e au 20e siecle’, Population et Famille, 50-51 (1980), pp. 137-178.
19. G. P. Mineau and I. Trussell, ‘A specification of marital fertility by parents’ age, age at marriage and marital duration’, Demography, 19(1982), pp. 335-350.
20. R. S. Schofieldand B. M. Berry, ‘Age at baptism in pre-industrial England’, Population Studies, 25(1971), pp. 453-463.
21. C. Vandenbroeke, F. van Poppel and A. M. van der Woude, ‘De zuigelingen-en kindersterfte in Belgie en Nederland in seculair perspectief’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis, 94 (1981), pp. 461-491.
22. J. Knodel, ‘Infant mortality and fertility in three Bavarian villages: an analysis of family histories from the 19th century’, Population Studies, 22 (1968), pp. 297-318.
23. E. A. Wrigley, ‘The growth of population in eighteenth century England: a conundrum resolved’, Past and Present, 98 (1983), pp. 121-150.
24. J. Knodel ‘Natural fertility in pre-industrial Germany’, Population Studies, 32 (1978), pp. 481-510.