Dynamic thermal line ratings Part I dynamic ampacity rating algorithm

IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems

Volumn PAS-102, Issue 6, 1983, Pages 1858-1864

  Foss, Stephen D ^a   Fernandes, Roosevelt A ^b  

^a GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL GRID   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE - MEASUREMENTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING - ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC LINES - AERIAL CONDUCTORS; ELECTRIC MEASUREMENTS - CURRENT; SURFACES - TEMPERATURE;

ALUMINUM CONDUCTOR STEEL REINFORCED CABLES; ATMOSPHERIC PRECIPITATION EFFECTS; SOLAR HEATING; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT; WIND VELOCITY;

ELECTRIC CABLES;

EID: 0020764636     PISSN: 00189510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1983.317795     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. H.E. House and P.D. Tuttle, “Current-Carrying Capacity of ACSR”, AIEE Trans. Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 1169–77, 1958.
2. G.E. Luke, “Current Carrying Capacity of Wires and Cables”, Westinghouse Electric Journal, Pittsburg, Pa., April 1923.
3. O.R. Schurig and C.W. Frick, “Heating and Current Carrying Capacity of Bare Conductors for Outdoor Service”, General Electric Review, Schenectady, N.Y., Vol. 33, March 1930.
4. H.P. Seeyle and A.L. Malmstrom, “Determining Current Ratings of Overhead Conductors, Parts I and II”, Electric Light and Power, Chicago, III., December 1943.
5. L.E. Olmstead, “Save Ratings for Overhead Line Conductors”, AIEE Trans., Vol. 62, pp. 845–53, 1943.
6. E.E. George, “Electrical Heating Characteristics of Overhead Conductors”, Parts I–IV, Electric Light and Power, Dec. 1944; Jan. 1945; April 1945,; Dec. 1945.
7. H.A. Enos, “Current Carrying Capacity of Overhead Conductors”, Electrical World, New York, N.Y., May 15, 1943.
8. J.H. Waghorne and V.E. Ogorodnikov, “Current Carrying Capacity of ACSR Conductors”, AIEE Trans., Vol. 70, Part II, pp 1159–62, 1951.
9. M. Davis, “A New Thermal Rating Approach: The Real-Time Thermal Rating System for Strategic Overhead Conductor Transmission Lines-Part I — General Description and Justification of the Real-Time Thermal Rating System”, IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-96, No 3, pp. 803–09, 1977.
10. M. Davis, “A New Thermal Rating Approach: The Real-Time Thermal Rating System for Strategic Overhead Conductor Transmission Lines-Part II — Steady-State Thermal Rating Program”, IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-96, No. 3, pp. 810–25, 1977.
11. M. Davis, “A New Thermal Rating Approach: The Real-Time Thermal Rating System for Strategic Overhead Conductor Transmission Lines-Part III — Steady-State Thermal Rating Program Continued — Solar Radiation Consideration”, IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-97, No. 2, pp. 444–45, 1978.
12. M. Davis, “A New Thermal Rating Approach: The Real Time Thermal Rating System for Strategic Overhead Conductor Transmission Lines-Part IV — Daily Comparisons of Real-Time and Conventional Thermal Ratings and Establishment of Typical Annual Weather Models”, IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-99, No. 6, pp. 2184–92, 1980.
13. M. Davis, “A New Thermal Rating Approach: The Real Time Thermal Rating System for Strategic Overhead Conductor Transmission Lines-Part V — Monthly and Annual Accumlative Frequency Distributions of Hourly Real-Time Thermal Ratings and Their Comparison with Conventional Ratings — Risk Curves”, IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-99, No. 5, pp. 2193–209, 1980.
14. H. Adams of Reynolds Metal Company of Richmond, Va. Critique to M. Davis paper — Reference (10).
15. E. Tanaka and H. Hoshino, “Transient Current Capacity of Aluminum Clad Steel Ground Wires”, IEEE Trans., Vol., PAS-89, No. 7, pp. 1493–98, 1970.
16. Anonymous, “Tailor Conductor Thermal Ratings to Need”, Electrical World, pp. 34–35, May 1976.