A randomized trial of vas occlusion versus vasectomy for male contraception

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1983, Pages 45-46

  Clausen, S ^a   Lindenberg, S ^a   Lykkegaard Nielsen, M ^a   Gerstenberg, T C ^a   Praetorius, B ^a  

^a FREDERIKSBERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALE CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; THERAPY; VAS DEFERENS LIGATION; VASECTOMY;

BLEEDING; CLIPS; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION FAILURE; EPIDIDYMITIS; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; FAMILY PLANNING; HEMATOMA; MALE STERILIZATION; MALE UROLOGIC SURGERY; SPERM COUNT; STERILIZATION, SEXUAL; SURGERY; TREATMENT; UROGENITAL SURGERY; USE-EFFECTIVENESS; VAS OCCLUSION; VASECTOMY;

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONTRACEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPERM COUNT; STERILIZATION REVERSAL; VAS DEFERENS; VASECTOMY;

EID: 0020570656     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: 16512065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365598309179779     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bagshaw, H.A., Masters, J.R.W. & Pryor, J.P. 1980. Factors influencing the outcome of vasectomy reversal. Br J Urol 52, 57-60.
2. Eldrup, J. 1978. Vasectomy employing a conservative surgical technique. Ugeskr Lag 140, 914-915.
3. Gupta, A.S., Kothari, L.K. & Devpura, T.P. 1977. Vas occlusion by tantalum clips and its comparison with conventional vasectomy in man: Reliability, reversibility, and complications. Fertil Steril 28, 1086-1089.
4. Jhaver, P.S., Davis, J.E., Lee, H., Hulka, J.F. & Leight, G. 1971. Reversibility of sterilization produced by vas occlusion clip. Fertil Steril 22, 263-268.