|
Volumn 388, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 45-71
|
COMPARISON OF TRANSIENT AND STEADY‐STATE METHODS
a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ATTENTION;
BRAIN;
COLOR VISION;
COMPUTER;
DISCRIMINATION LEARNING;
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE;
FOURIER ANALYSIS;
HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE;
HUMAN;
METHODOLOGY;
PATTERN RECOGNITION;
PHOTOSTIMULATION;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PSYCHOPHYSICS;
VISION;
VISUAL SYSTEM;
AVERAGING;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM;
DIAGNOSIS;
EVOKED RESPONSE;
FOURIER TRANSFORMATION;
INFORMATION;
REVIEW;
VISUAL STIMULATION;
ATTENTION;
BRAIN;
COLOR PERCEPTION;
COMPUTERS;
DISCRIMINATION LEARNING;
DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL;
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL;
FOURIER ANALYSIS;
HUMAN;
PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;
PHOTIC STIMULATION;
PSYCHOPHYSICS;
SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;
VISUAL PATHWAYS;
VISUAL PERCEPTION;
|
EID: 0020331720
PISSN: 00778923
EISSN: 17496632
Source Type: Book Series
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50784.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (91)
|
References (53)
|