Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the darp research program

Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 7-29

  Simpson, D Dwayne ^a   Sells, S B ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HUMAN; REHABILITATION; THERAPY;

EID: 0020307270     PISSN: 02703106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J251v02n01_02     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Sells SB (ed). Effectiveness of drug abuse treatment (2 vols). Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1974.
2. Sells SB, Simpson DD (eds). Effectiveness of drug abuse treatment (3 vols). Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1976.
3. Sells SB, Associates. The DARP research program and data system: summary of during-treatment findings. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1975; 2:1-136.
4. Sells SB, Demaree RG, Simpson DD, Joe GW, Gorsuch RL. Issues in the evaluation of drug abuse treatment. Professional Psychology. 1977; 8:609-46.
5. Sells SB, Simpson DD. A case for drug abuse treatment effectiveness based on the DARP research program. Br J Addic. 1980; 75(2): 117-32.
6. Sells SB. Treatment effectiveness. In: DuPont R, Goldstein A, O’Donnell J, eds. Handbook on drug abuse. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1979.
7. Simpson DD, Sells SB. Highlights of the DARP follow-up research on the evaluation of drug abuse treatment effectiveness (IBR Report 81-3). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1981.
8. Simpson DD, Sells SB. Evaluation of drug abuse treatment effectiveness: summary of the DARP follow-up research. NIDA Treatment Research Report (DHHS No. ADM 82-1209). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1982.
9. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Joe, GW, Demaree RG, Sells SB. DARP Data Book: statistics on characteristics of drug users in treatment during 1969-1974 (IBR Report 76-4). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1976.
10. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Sells SB. Data book on drug treatment outcomes: Follow-up study of 1969-1972 admissions to the Drug Abuse Reporting Program (DARP) (IBR Report 78-10). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1978.
11. Simpson DD, Bracy SA, Savage LJ. Data book on posttreatment outcomes: follow-up study of 1972-1973 admissions to the DARP (IBR Report 81-11). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1981.
12. Simpson DD, Joe GW. Sample design and data collection: National follow-up study of admissions to drug abuse treatment in the DARP during 1969-1972 (IBR Report 77-8). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1977.
13. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR, Savage LJ. Sample design and data collection for the follow-up study of 1972-1973 DARP admissions (IBR Report 79-14). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1979.
14. Joe GW, Lehman W, Simpson DD. Addict death rates during a four-year posttreatment follow-up. Am J Public Health. 1982; 72(7):703-9.
15. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR, Sells SB. Nonresponse bias in the follow-up sample of 1972-1973 DARP admissions (IBR Report 79-16). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1979.
16. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR, Gent MJ. Reliability and validity of data: national follow-up study of admissions to drug abuse treatments in the DARP during 1969- 1971 (IBR Report 76-18). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1976.
17. Sells SB, Demaree RG, Homick CW. Comparative effectiveness of drug abuse treatment modalities. NIDA Service Research Administrative Report. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1979.
18. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Sells SB. Evaluation of outcomes in the first year after drag abuse treatment: a replication study based on 1972-1973 DARP admissions. National Information Technical Service (No. NIDA/DRD/80/05). Springfield VA: US Department of Commerce, 1980.
19. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Lloyd MR, Sells SB. Evaluation of drug abuse treatments based on the first year after DARP: national follow-up study of admissions to drug abuse treatments in the DARP during 1969-1972. NIDA Services Research Monograph (DHEW No. ADM 78-701). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1978.
20. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Lloyd MR. Follow-up evaluation of treatment of drug abuse during 1969 to 1972. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979; 36:772-80.
21. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR. Alcohol and illicit drug use: Follow-up study of treatment admissions to DARP during 1969-1971. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1978; 5:1-21.
22. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR. Alcohol use following treatment for drug addiction: A four year follow-up. J Studies Alcohol. 1981; 42(3):323-35.
23. Joe GW, Gent MJ. Drug treatment histories for a sample of drug users in DARP. NIDA Services Research Report (DHEW No. ADM 78-634). Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1978.
24. Simpson DD, Savage LJ, Joe GW. Treatment histories of clients treated for drug abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1980; 7(2): 127-40.
25. Simpson DD, Savage LJ. Client types in different drug abuse treatments: comparisons of follow-up outcomes. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1981-82; 8(4):401-18.
26. Neman JF, Demaree RG, Homick CW, Sells SB. Client characteristics and other variables associated with differential post-DARP outcome groups (IBR Report 77-16). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1977.
27. Savage LJ, Simpson DD. Effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A log-linear analysis of categorical outcome patterns (IBR Report 81-4). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1981.
28. Homick CW, Demaree RG, Sells SB, Neman JF. Measurement of post- DARP outcomes: the definition of a composite and differential outcome groups (IBR Report 77-17). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1977.
29. Cole SG, Watterson, O. A treatment typology for drug abuse in the DARP: 1971-1972 admissions. In: Sells SB, Simpson DD, eds. Effectiveness of drug abuse treatment (Vol. 3). Further studies of drug users treatment typologies and assessment of outcomes during treatment in the DARP. Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1976.
30. Simpson DD. The relation of time in drug abuse treatment to posttreatment outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 1979; 136:1449-53.
31. Simpson DD. Treatment for drug abuse: follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981; 38(8):875-80.
32. Savage LJ, Simpson DD. Posttreatment outcomes of sex and ethnic group treated in methadone maintenance during 1969-1972. J Psychedelic Drugs. 1980; 12:55-63.
33. Savage LJ, Simpson DD. Drug use and crime during a four year posttreatment follow-up. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1981; 8(1): 1-16.
34. Bracy SA, Simpson DD. Outcomes of opioid addicts five years after admission to drug abuse treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1982; 9(2):in press.
35. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Bracy SA. Six year follow-up of opioid addicts after admission to treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982; in press.
36. Savage LJ, Simpson DD. Illicit drag use and return to treatment: follow-up study of treatment admissions to DARP during 1969-1971. Am J Drag Alcohol Abuse. 1978; 12:55-63.
37. Simpson DD, Savage LJ. Drug abuse treatment readmission and outcomes: three year follow-up of DARP patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980; 37(8):896-901.
38. Simpson DSD, Savage LJ. Treatment reentry and outcomes of opioid addicts a four year follow-up after drug abuse treatment in the United States. Bull Narcotics. 1980; 32(4): 1-10.
39. Joe GW, Simpson DD. Social factors effecting the follow-up status of opioid addicts (IBR Report 81-18). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1981.
40. Joe GW, Singh BK, Lehman W, Simpson DD, Sells SB. Agency differences in posttreatment outcomes: a follow-up of drug abuse treatment clients. International J Addic. 1983; 18(3):in press.
41. Simpson DD. Employment among opioid addicts during a four year follow-up after drug abuse treatment. J Drug Issues. 1981; 11(3):435-49.
42. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR. Client evaluations of drug abuse treatment in relation to follow-up outcomes. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1969; 6:397-411.
43. Hater JJ, Singh BK, Simpson DD. Family and religion variables in relation to posttreatment follow-up outcomes among opioid addicts (IBR Report 80-10). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1980.
44. Simpson DD, Crandall RP, Savage LJ, Pavia-Krueger E. Leisure patterns of opioid addicts: a six year follow-up of DARP admissions. NIDA Services Research Report (DHEW No. ADM 81-1040). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1980. Abbreviated version published in J Counseling Psychology. 1981; 28:36-9.
45. Hater JJ, Simpson DD. Use of community services by opioid addicts. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1981; 13(4): 361-8.
46. Simpson DD, Lloyd MR, Savage LJ. Follow-up outcomes in the first month after drug abuse treatment (IBR Report 79-2). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1979.
47. Joe GW, Sells SB. Treatment history patterns and outcome groups associations (IBR Report 78-1). Fort Worth TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1978.