The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged earsa)

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 1982, Pages 774-780

  Zurek, Patrick M ^a   Clark, William W ^b   Kim, D O ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Central Institute for the Deaf ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

43.63. Kz; 43.66. Gf; 43.66. Ki; 43.66. Sr; PACS numbers

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; NOISE INJURY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMAL; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; EAR CANAL; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0020183581     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: NA     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.388258     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, S. D., and Kemp, D. T. (1979). “The evoked cochlear mechanical response in laboratory primates. A preliminary report,” Arch. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 224, 47–54.
2. Bohne, B. A. (1976). “Safe level for noise exposure?,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 85, 711–724.
3. Bohne, B. A., and Clark, W. W. (1982). “Growth of hearing loss and cochlear lesion with increasing duration of noise exposure,” in New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, edited by D. Henderson, R. Hamer-nik, and R. Salvi (Raven, New York), pp. 283–302.
4. Clark, W. W., and Bohne, B. A. (1978). “Animal model for the 4-khz tonal dip,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 51, 87, 1–16.
5. Dallos, P. (1977). “comment on ‘some observations on two-tone interaction measured with the mossbauer effect’ by w. s. rhode,” in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing edited by E. F. Evans and J. P. Wilson (Academic, New York), p. 39.
6. Dallos, P., Harris, P. M., Relkin, E., and Cheatham, M. A. (1980). “Two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: effect of outer hair cell lesions,” in Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing edited by G. Van Den Brink and F. A. Bilson (Delft U. P., Delft, The Netherlands), pp. 242–249.
7. Eldredge, D. H., Miller, J. D., and Bohne, B. A. (1981). “A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 1091–1095.
8. Kemp, D. T. (1978). “Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386–1391.
9. Kemp, D. T. (1979). “Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea,” Arch. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 224, 37–45.
10. Kim, D. O. (1980). “Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiologi-cal and acoustical observations,” Hear. Res. 2, 297–317.
11. Kim, D. O., Siegel, J. H., and Molnar, C. E. (1979). “Cochlear nonlinear phenomena in two-tone responses,” Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 9, 63–81.
12. Kim, D. O., Monar, C. E., and Matthews, J. W. (1980). “Cochlear mechanics nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 1704–1721.
13. Kim, D. O., Zurek, P. M., and Clark, W. W. (1981). “Ear-canal acoustic distortion products (2/, - < f2) and (2f2-/,) can be suppressed or enhanced by a third tone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 69, S51.
14. Leshowitz, B., and Lindstrom, R. (1977). “Measurement of nonlinearities in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, edited by E. F. Evans and J. P. Wilson (Academic, New York), pp. 283–292.
15. Saunders, J. C., Mills, J. H., and Miller, J. D. (1977). “Threshold shift in the chinchilla from daily exposure to noise for six hours,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 558–570.
16. Schmiedt, R. A., Zwislocki, J. J., and Hamemik, R. P. (1980). “Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers i,” J. Neurophysiol. 43, 1367–1389.
17. Siegel, J. H., and Kim, D. O. (1982). “Cochlear biomechanics: Vulnerability to acoustic trauma, and other alterations as seen in neural responses and ear-canal sound pressure,” in New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Losse dited by D. Henderson, R. Hamemik, and R. Salvi (Raven, New York), pp. 137–152.
18. Smoorenburg, G. F. (1972). “Combination tones and their origin,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 615–632.
19. Wightman, F., McGee, T., and Kramer, M. (1977). “Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, edited by E. F. Evans and J. P. Wilson (Academic, New York), pp. 295–306.
20. Wilson, J. P. (1980). “The combination tones, 2/, -/2, in psychophysics and ear-canal recording,” in Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, edited by G. Van Den Brink and F. A. Bilson (Delft U. P., Delft, The Netherlands), pp. 43–50.
21. Zurek, P. M. (1981). “Spontaneous narrow-band acoustic signals emitted by human ears,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 514–523.
22. Zurek, P. M., and Sachs, R. M. (1979). “Combination tones at frequencies greater than the primary tones,” Science 205, 600–602.
23. Zurek, P. M., Clark, W. W., and Kim, D. O. (1981). “The behavior of acoustically-measured distortion products in the ear canals of normal and noise-exposed chinchillas,” Abstracts 4th Midwinter Research Meeting, Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., p. 6.