|
|
Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1982, Pages 285-328
|
|
The right to die on the slippery slope.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ALTRUISM;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
BENEFICENCE;
CONSEQUENCES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICAL THEORY;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
FREEDOM;
HOMICIDE;
HOSPICE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
MORALITY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
PRIVACY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
CONSEQUENCES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
ALTRUISM;
BENEFICENCE;
COERCION;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
ETHICAL THEORY;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FREEDOM;
HOMICIDE;
HOSPICES;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
HUMANS;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
MORALS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PRIVACY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 0020174963
PISSN: 0037802X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract19828314 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (11)
|
|
References (0)
|
