메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1982, Pages 14-17

Why Doctors Should Intervene

(1)  ACKERMAN, TERRENCE F a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY;

EID: 0020171923     PISSN: 00930334     EISSN: 1552146X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3560762     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (29)

References (11)
  • 6
    • 0004222465 scopus 로고
    • New York:, Lippincott,. Although Cassell aptly describes the goal of the healer's art, it is unclear whether he considers it to be based upon the obligation to respect the patient's autonomy or the duty to enhance the well‐being of the patient. Some parts of his discussion clearly suggest the latter
    • (1976) The Healer's Art , pp. 44
    • Cassell1
  • 9
    • 0012680539 scopus 로고
    • “Legalism and Medical Ethics,”
    • My formulation of the components of the legal model differs from, but is highly indebted to, John Ladd's stimulating analysis in, John Davis et al., editors, Clifton, NJ:, The Humana Press,. However, I would not endorse Ladd's position that the moral principles that define our duties in the therapeutic setting are of a different logical type from those that define our duties to strangers
    • (1979) Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Ethics , pp. 1-35
  • 10
    • 1842839376 scopus 로고
    • “Therapeutic Relationship: Contemporary Medical Perspective,”
    • Warren Reich, editor, New York:, Macmillan
    • (1978) Encyclopedia of Bioethics , pp. 1675
    • Cassell1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.